Hello, I am addressing you for the sake of equality of play. I find it abnormal that one can make an extra spot in the derby by paying with diamonds. Everyone can not do it ... it is equivalent to "paying for his victory" ... Which is to say that there is no merit to be won ... it would be better with points which have Been won by playing and not by paying. For my part I will never take extra spots with diamonds, I call it cheating and segregation with money. A game must be fair ...
traduction google
bonjour, je m'adresse a vous par souci d'égalité de jeu. je trouve anormal que l'on puisse faire une tache supplémentaire au derby en payant avec des diamants. Tout le monde ne peut pas le faire... cela équivaut a "payer sa victoire"... Ce qui revient a dire qu'il n'y a aucun mérite à gagner...cela passerait mieux avec des points qui eux ont été gagnés en jouant et non en payant. Pour ma part je ne prendrai jamais de taches supplémentaires avec des diamants, j'appelle ça de la triche et de la ségrégation à l'argent. un jeu doit être équitable...
I disagree. I never take the extra task and I enjoy playing the derby. I do not think it is cheating at all. It is available to everyone should you chose to use your diamonds that way. And the game gives us plenty of ways to collect diamonds for free.
I think SuperCell has a right to make money with this game and the extra ten diamonds are a way people spend their money. If they don't spend money on the game, SuperCell cannot keep it going. And then I can't farm every day.
So please, please, please keep buying that extra task farmers!
I also love to participate in the derby. I also love hay day. We are only 3 in the neighborhood and currently we are in 2nd place in league of the champions. Only I know very well that the 3rd and 4th current "will buy" the podium at the end of the derby ... I agree with you Hay Day must be able to earn money to continue the game but certainly not doing " Pay "the victories of a contest ... It is a nonsense ... COMPETITION = EQUALITY OF COMPETITORS
Moi aussi j'adore participer au derby. Moi aussi j'aime hay day. Nous ne sommes que 3 dans le voisinage et actuellement nous sommes en 2eme place en ligue des champions. seulement je sais tres bien que les 3eme et 4eme actuels "acheteront" le podium a la fin du derby... Je suis d'accord avec vous Hay Day doit pouvoir gagner de l'argent pour continuer le jeu mais certainement pas en faisant "payer" les victoires d'un concours... C'est un non sens... CONCOURS = EGALITE DES CONCURRENTS
I think we do not have the same value of the word EQUALITY. If you absolutely want to pay for the derby, free to you ... But at this time there, we give the competitors the possibility to choose between a derby paying and another non-paying ... We make the choice at the beginning of Derby for one or the other ... At that moment I would say "YES the derby is equal for all".
je pense que nous n'avons pas la meme valeur du mot EGALITE. Si vous voulez absolument payer pour le derby, libre a vous... Mais a ce moment là que l,on donne aux concurents la possibilité de choisir entre un derby payant et un autre non payant... On fait le choix en début de derby pour l'un ou l'autre... A ce moment là je dirais "OUI le derby est égal pour tous".
Also -- there are other places in the game where you can get ahead by using diamonds. The boat leaderboard for example. You can use diamonds to bring the boat quicker and, of course, speed up all of the tasks required to fill the crates.
C'est une question de choix ... Hay Day est un jeu gratuit à l'origine ... et tu peux très bien jouer
des heures sans dépenser un centime ... la monétisation de certains aspects (comme le derby en particulier)
est une manière pour le concepteur du jeu de faire quelque argent. Payer les programmeurs et le frais de
serveur / connection internet entre autre.
A mettre en rapport avec un jeu sur PS4 par exemple ... un jeu se vend 50-60 $ et tu as alors accès à un
jeu complet et quand tu es bien accro, l'éditeur du jeu te fait payer pour quelque niveaux supplémentaires.
Cas typique Ubisoft et sa franchise Assassin's Creed !
Cas atypique CD Projekt Red et The Witcher III ou tu peux avoir 16 'add-ons' gratos !
>>>>> Translated by me <<<<<
It is a matter of choice ... Originally Hay Day is a free to play game ... and you can play for hours without
spending a single cent. That you need to pay for some functionalities (derby extra task for example) is a way
for the game designer to earn a bit of money. To pay for the programmers / servers / internet connection
among others.
Compare this to a PS4 game for example ... a full game cost in the range of 50-60 $ and you do have access
to a complete game ... but when you are well addicted to it, then the editor is selling to you some DLC with
some additional level, gears, etc ...
Typical case is UbiSoft and its franchise Assassin's Creed !
A-typical case is CD Projekt Red and The Witcher III where you can download 16 add-ons for free !
Last edited by HeJePi; June 2nd, 2017 at 10:47 AM.