Recently i attacked a village where I had wanted to heal my Barbarian King so he would keep attacking but before I could find my heal spell in my mix of troops/spells to choose from in attacking he had already sustained heavy damage and became dizzy. I would like to see the heal spell put them back in action...I mean shouldn't a heal spell heal?? Please consider Supercell.
To be honest I think it may be a bit too unbalanced if you could do that with the heal spell. Who's to say someone wont raid with a bunch of heal spells to keep their BK or AQ in action?
People already raid with a bunch of heal spells to keep their troops in action. So what is the difference here? Besides, after such an attack the Heroes are going to be 'sleeping' anyway until they heal. What if i attack and all defenses are defeated but right before defenses are down my Hero becomes dizzy and i have a heal spell i didn't use so why not heal him now while troops are attacking buildings to 3 star, this would allow players to not have to wait quite as long to use their Hero again.
The difference with troops is that once they're dead they're dead. You're effectively gaining extra units in raid by resurrecting your hero over and over.
Ok, I could see ur point if the opponent's Hero is pretty high level, thats one thing i coukd agree with u on. Maybe supercell could implement it where if u have a heal spell you could use it on your Heroes back at your base to reduce 'wait time' though i could see the argument from Supercell stating that people wouldn't use gems on sleeping Heroes..I think the idea is logical though if you're going to call it a heal spell..ultimately its up to Supercell to decide and weigh the pros/cons of this.
Posting Permissions
