
Originally Posted by
SuperStorm103
This is a game and a closed system. Attack skills are just that your skill at attacking. To this day their attacking skills are unproven one way or the other. What is proven is their extreme engineering skills. No doubt there. Probably best in the business. I might even concede the point if you changed your statement to Game Skills. Attack skills are specific in nature.
While your view has some truth, it is not consistent. Outside of the war setting for example, If a maxed town hall 11 in a farming run crushes a town hall 5...100% 3 star! If he came here bragging about his attack skills, would you congratulate him on them or point out that there was nothing remarkable about his attack? According to you he would have the best attack skills because he dominated that th5. But we all know there was nothing praise worthy about that attack. And, would still have no clue if said player was a good attacker or a bad one unless he failed though. Then we would know he was a bad attacker. But who would come here bragging about an attack like that?