#6ayMartians warring strategy revealed!

[Matteliszt]

Plz tell me how im wrong. I welcome it. O btw, im willing to back up my words. I have fully max th9,10,11. I welcome any of them to hit it. Lets c shall we?

So because they don't care enough to show you they're bad? Okay.

[kimchilove]

Have you been in their clan? Have you warred with them? Have you beaten them at war?

If the answer is no to these questions and your basis of knowledge is seeing a base you could 3 star you aren't in a position to say they aren't good attackers

Lol nevermind. Ignorance is bliss. Psst, perhaps u should read op posts before making ridiculous statements eh? Shrug

[kimchilove]

Have you been in their clan? Have you warred with them? Have you beaten them at war?

If the answer is no to these questions and your basis of knowledge is seeing a base you could 3 star you aren't in a position to say they aren't good attackers

N ♥♥♥♥ they will never war me bc it would b a bloodbath. I already tried challenging them lol

[SinOfDusk]

This is why I don't agree with some of the players here. I don't see "9v9" or 11v11" 3 stars as skill, I only see wins. If you win, that simply means you're better than the enemy, fullstop.

That's why when we used to watch skirmishes, you see people saying "clan A had more 9v9 3 stars, but they still lost". 9v9 3 stars isn't a indication of skill or being better, only the eventual war outcome counts.

Remember the win condition, 3 stars do not win wars, but they help. The only thing you can do to win wars is to get more stars than the enemy, it's that simple. So what if my clan used more dips to get the stars? We win in the end and that's all that you need to know.

Im not from Martians but this is my philosophy. And I'm still puzzled as to why so many people regard 9v9/10v10/11v11 3 stars as "skilled" or say "show me their 9v9/11v11 3 stars" because it doesn't matter. The clan that wins is the better clan overall, not the clan with most 3 stars between equal bases

Edit: this is also why I laugh at players who say 40/40 heroes are absolutely necessary in th10. You can easily 2 star a maxed th11 with 20/20 royals, it should be your th11's job to clear our all th10s, not a th10's job. The rationale is the same, you do not need to 3star your equal, because that doesn't win you wars. You just need to get more stars than your enemy

[Matteliszt]

This is why I don't agree with some of the players here. I don't see "9v9" or 11v11" 3 stars as skill, I only see wins. If you win, that simply means you're better than the enemy, fullstop.

That's why when we used to watch skirmishes, you see people saying "clan A had more 9v9 3 stars, but they still lost". 9v9 3 stars isn't a indication of skill or being better, only the eventual war outcome counts.

Remember the win condition, 3 stars do not win wars, but they help. The only thing you can do to win wars is to get more stars than the enemy, it's that simple. So what if my clan used more dips to get the stars? We win in the end and that's all that you need to know.

Im not from Martians but this is my philosophy. And I'm still puzzled as to why so many people regard 9v9/10v10/11v11 3 stars as "skilled" or say "show me their 9v9/11v11 3 stars" because it doesn't matter. The clan that wins is the better clan overall, not the clan with most 3 stars between equal bases

Edit: this is also why I laugh at players who say 40/40 heroes are absolutely necessary in th10. You can easily 2 star a maxed th11 with 20/20 royals, it should be your th11's job to clear our all th10s, not a th10's job. The rationale is the same, you do not need to 3star your equal, because that doesn't win you wars. You just need to get more stars than your enemy

Guy who gets it! Literally no clan in the game (except all 11 v 11 wars and even then all bases would have to be maxed) doesn't use dips

[SuperStorm103]

This is why I don't agree with some of the players here. I don't see "9v9" or 11v11" 3 stars as skill, I only see wins. If you win, that simply means you're better than the enemy, fullstop.

That's why when we used to watch skirmishes, you see people saying "clan A had more 9v9 3 stars, but they still lost". 9v9 3 stars isn't a indication of skill or being better, only the eventual war outcome counts.

Remember the win condition, 3 stars do not win wars, but they help. The only thing you can do to win wars is to get more stars than the enemy, it's that simple. So what if my clan used more dips to get the stars? We win in the end and that's all that you need to know.

Im not from Martians but this is my philosophy. And I'm still puzzled as to why so many people regard 9v9/10v10/11v11 3 stars as "skilled" or say "show me their 9v9/11v11 3 stars" because it doesn't matter. The clan that wins is the better clan overall, not the clan with most 3 stars between equal bases

Edit: this is also why I laugh at players who say 40/40 heroes are absolutely necessary in th10. You can easily 2 star a maxed th11 with 20/20 royals, it should be your th11's job to clear our all th10s, not a th10's job. The rationale is the same, you do not need to 3star your equal, because that doesn't win you wars. You just need to get more stars than your enemy

The big picture is who won the war you are right. But, the current topic being discussed is attack skills not clan structuring skills. I think it's obvious they have a winning/best clan structure.....

[SuperStorm103]

Guy who gets it! Literally no clan in the game (except all 11 v 11 wars and even then all bases would have to be maxed) doesn't use dips

You are also correct, dips are a part of winning. But some clans can win with very few dips as their players can 3 star their equal, while other clans have to resort to almost 100% dips to win. Gratzz to them for making it easy on themselves. But again, that is not the topic being discussed.

[kimchilove]

This is why I don't agree with some of the players here. I don't see "9v9" or 11v11" 3 stars as skill, I only see wins. If you win, that simply means you're better than the enemy, fullstop.

That's why when we used to watch skirmishes, you see people saying "clan A had more 9v9 3 stars, but they still lost". 9v9 3 stars isn't a indication of skill or being better, only the eventual war outcome counts.

Remember the win condition, 3 stars do not win wars, but they help. The only thing you can do to win wars is to get more stars than the enemy, it's that simple. So what if my clan used more dips to get the stars? We win in the end and that's all that you need to know.

Im not from Martians but this is my philosophy. And I'm still puzzled as to why so many people regard 9v9/10v10/11v11 3 stars as "skilled" or say "show me their 9v9/11v11 3 stars" because it doesn't matter. The clan that wins is the better clan overall, not the clan with most 3 stars between equal bases

Edit: this is also why I laugh at players who say 40/40 heroes are absolutely necessary in th10. You can easily 2 star a maxed th11 with 20/20 royals, it should be your th11's job to clear our all th10s, not a th10's job. The rationale is the same, you do not need to 3star your equal, because that doesn't win you wars. You just need to get more stars than your enemy

Truth I can c that pt. To each is own. Win or lose, I just prefer challenge but thats just me. I rather take a loss n have a fun close war than a win over a overmatched opponent anyday. Its no fun to me bullying others. Its the challenge that makes the game exciting for me

[kimchilove]

The big picture is who won the war you are right. But, the current topic being discussed is attack skills not clan structuring skills. I think it's obvious they have a winning/best clan structure.....

What he said n ill take credit fo that thought also

[SuperStorm103]

What he said n ill take credit fo that thought also

I said it better.....