Naval Warfare

[SleazyDemon]

While it may flatter you to think so, it really isn't about you. I comment on a variety of posted ideas in a number of different threads.

Also I didn't for example comment on:

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...ing-the-Fenrir

or

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...tower-upgrades (although I probably should, since a range increase would vastly alter the existing game balance)

or

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...45892-Saboteur (I didn't have to...it was already universally panned)

oh give it a rest. In this thread all you have done is picked at every single possible thing that i said, you barely made a contribution to this tread other than that. And why would i be flattered for...you...or anyone elde for that matter concentrate on me.
oh and go ahead, i couldnt care less.
you also sai "its not about you" then why did you have to go to my profile and see what I've commented on, all its shows is that you are petty enough to find and pick apart anything ive said

[Baconman]

oh give it a rest. In this thread all you have done is picked at every single possible thing that i said, you barely made a contribution to this tread other than that. And why would i be flattered for...you...or anyone elde for that matter concentrate on me.

I guess it only counts as a contribution if you agree with it? He contributed by giving his opinion on the idea. Be it a negative or positive opinion, he has a right to it, and a right to post it.

[dahimi]

oh give it a rest. In this thread all you have done is picked at every single possible thing that i said, you barely made a contribution to this tread other than that. And why would i be flattered for...you...or anyone elde for that matter concentrate on me.
oh and go ahead, i couldnt care less.

I replied to a number of different people in this thread actually, not just you. Also I was under the impression we were having a dialogue. You say something to me, I respond, etc...

If you couldn't care less, why bring it up?

As for my contributions to this thread, I explained pretty clearly why I don't think this is a good idea. That's my contribution.

[SleazyDemon]

I guess it only counts as a contribution if you agree with it? He contributed by giving his opinion on the idea. Be it a negative or positive opinion, he has a right to it, and a right to post it.

W
hat i mean is he dust give some huge lecture to anyone about why its bad, other than me, thats not contributing, its being picky. I've got nothing against him and he has made some valid reason, but he then stopped to focus on me.

[Baconman]

W
hat i mean is he dust give some huge lecture to anyone about why its bad, other than me, thats not contributing, its being picky. I've got nothing against him and he has made some valid reason, but he then stopped to focus on me.

I got the impression you two were in a dialogue. Why would be not reply to you ?

[Allybug01]

I want monkeys in barrels in the next update

[SleazyDemon]

I got the impression you two were in a dialogue. Why would be not reply to you ?

MINE t
ried to end the dialogue at multiple times, because he was just picking at me, but he picked at me again.

[dahimi]

W
hat i mean is he dust give some huge lecture to anyone about why its bad, other than me, thats not contributing, its being picky. I've got nothing against him and he has made some valid reason, but he then stopped to focus on me.

I'm somewhat confused now. You say my some of my reasons are valid, and yet also indicate expressing them is not contributing.

Also what you call "huge lecture" I call "thorough explanation". I wish all ideas were given careful consideration and were provided with a good thorough explanation that describes all of the different angles involved.

Perhaps I'd be willing to back the concept of naval battles if the points I rose regarding them were countered to my satisfaction.

Unfortunately most people seem to turn their brains off when cornered.

MINE t
ried to end the dialogue at multiple times, because he was just picking at me, but he picked at me again.

You did? It seems to me, that a surefire way to do that would be to stop replying to me or talking about me.

[SleazyDemon]

I'm somewhat confused now. You say my some of my reasons are valid, and yet also indicate expressing them is not contributing.
Yes, some of your reasons were valid, but that means some not all, and i indicated most of your "contributions" were the ones were you picked at everything you could. Every can make a small contribution and thats what you did, you made a small contribution.

Also what you call "huge lecture" I call "thorough explanation". I wish all ideas were given careful consideration and were provided with a good thorough explanation that describes all of the different angles involved.
what i call "a huge lecture" is when you decide to write half a page to me, and no one else.

Perhaps I'd be willing to back the concept of naval battles if the points I rose regarding them were countered to my satisfaction.
The fact your against the idea means your will never be satisfied, so that wont happen

[SleazyDemon]

You did? It seems to me, that a surefire way to do that would be to stop replying to me or talking about me.

What and sit there and watch you gloat about how you managed to make me shut up or how you won the argument?