People should really post pictures of what they think is an unfair match. Personally, i war at primarily th11 so I do not run into these problems. That being said, I have been in my fair share of engineered clans with my mini accounts and even then, the matches I see there are not THAT unfair.
Post some proof people... not just hearsay
riskyOriginally Posted by ExclusiveInvicta
yes but you have been doing it right
copy enemy base go to random clan mod there return
i am sure you have a twitter account right?
because it's all over twitter lol
i hope soon SC takes a look into it
SC definitely has to come in and fix it. And i also have 2+ years experience, with a th11 and 3 th9 accounts, with combined hero totals of 201. So i consider myself qualified to speak about gameplay. And I just got out of a war that we COULDN'T win. That should never happen in 2017. Every clan should be able to attack n defend to a win, in every single war it engages in. Once that goal is accomplished, I wont have to come to these forums.
Last edited by daddylindo; January 17th, 2017 at 03:28 PM.
I used to mod but stopped around September 2016 ish. A little before the permanent bans actually, so I lucked out pretty hard lol. I do not have twitter btw, could you link me to some?risky
yes but you have been doing it right
copy enemy base go to random clan mod there return
i am sure you have a twitter account right?
because it's all over twitter lol
i hope soon SC takes a look into it
Also, how do you copy the enemy base and mod with the 24 hour timer and preparation day unless you are spying?
This example already won't happen. TH11, even if defenseless, doesn't draw a th7. Don't be fooled by mirror comparison.
It's always the closet engineers that are the most bitter. Trying to maintain a righteous pose while doing exactly what they claim to hate, lashing out at anyone that points out the obvious.
Also to people talking about unwinnable wars...
about a week ago we ran into a 66 win streak clan and were at a big disadvantage... yet we won 89-84
I read about that. One war. I did too just had a war i couldnt win. The 1st one is the past 78 wars. So 2 in 79 matchups being bad sounds like its 97.5% good matchups then. 97.5% would be an A pretty much anywhere.
I'm not suggesting TH3 junk on the bottom needs to be penalised though - just take a realistic account of how much difference it makes to the war. Which is none at all. Those bottom bases would still be considered when checking mirrors to see if the clans are similar, so would count as some dissimilarity. But the bottom should be ignored completely when checking the overall clan total. So there wouldn't be a tendency to stick a TH11 on top for the bottom-stacked clan to 'balance up'.
If we're TH10-8 and we included a TH3 to make up the numbers I'd expect them to match to a TH8 and be happy with it. That's my choice in sticking in a junk base.
2015. Most of 2015. They rebalanced offence and defence to be equal sometime early 2015, and the time from then onwards was best. Actually, for us, pretty much until March 2016, although I know that for clans very heavy on TH10s, the introduction of TH11 with a very small population of them made MM at that end very screwy for a while.
During that time we would have an almost perfect TH match every time in 40v wars (which appear to be a much smaller population and harder to match from the cocp.it data). There would often be a 1 or 2 base discrepancy in the middle where we went from TH8 to TH9 - but that doesn't make a huge difference to the war. We wouldn't be outnumbered 2-6 on TH10s or whatever - unless they were comedy rushers, in which case the war probably was actually balanced.
Well, if that's the metric, early-mid 2015 we were usually doing 20-odd, with one 50+. By just before October 2016 that had dropped to about 3 or 4 typically before we got smacked in the face by defenceless TH11s. It has gotten better since then, and perhaps better again since December - we haven't been massively roster engineered since, but that might just be luck. However I've seen other wars that seemed to be a non-starter due to roster, such as...Upthread someone said you've just lost a 10 win streak. I know that's frustrating, but its a cliche in this forum that someone drops by with a low post count, 'we lost a war something must be done!' with a new idea that we've been arguing about for years. But the fact that you made it to 10 without engineering largely invalidates your argument. If less than one in ten wars are unwinnable, the matchmaker is doing fine given the serious constraints of the game.
I went to see DaddyLindo's last match, that he was complaining about. It was unwinnable. His clan could have closed the score a little, but couldn't win unless the enemy were total morons. As you'd expect, the enemy had IIRC 5 zero weight bases on the bottom out of 25.
Various data posts: Who plays what? CWL data 1 (stars), 2 (3* rates), 3 (rosters), 4 (start times and other) Data at end of old Legends And (non-data) how max bases are ordered in war
Its not 1, we have 6 losses in the last 2 months. Of those 6, i consider 4 of them as unfair advantages. 2 of those 4 were EGREGIOUS. But 4 of them they had junk on bottom to clean lowers, and then they had sheer brute strength up top which led to too many extra attacks WHERE IT MATTERED, not the sister mary francis th9's without xbows. They had max th11 heroes. Stacked 9.5's on our 9's with monster heroes. The other 2 we lost, one of them we let slip away but it was fair. And the last one they had a minimal slight advantage but I wont call it unfair. So there is a pattern going on.
If you're asking this question... your a troll account. Or not really part of Invicta/EE/ whatever current alliance is in place. Certainly not running with the likes of the heavies over there- otherwise you'd know exactly what the drill is. Maybe you're just playing possum.
Level: 187 | TH10 | IGN: cnaf11
retired
Posting Permissions
