Because first off, the match should've never existed. So it's an inadmissable statement. Second, since youre exchanging their 2 and 3 for different town halls, why do they get to keep their fully max th11 up top? They were just stronger players at this particular point in life when we met up. It doesnt mean they were a superior clan. They were good n organized though. Kudos to that. I give credit where credit is due.Originally Posted by SupremeCleave
whats wrong with their 1 being a fully maxxed th11? your 1 has a max eagle and th11 defenses. There's no one to blame for a bad offense to defense ratio, not even the mathmaker.
regardless, its all just speculation... but they for sure did have a better #1.
i still think they were superior though... i mean its one thing for them to have to use their 2 and 3 (the advantage) to win, but they did not have to do it.
Kudos to you guys from going through the match though. It was unwinnable but you did give them a fight.
Kudos to them for not needing their 2 and 3 to win the war for them though and kudos for the better base designs/attacks
But do you truly think you would have won the war even if their 2 and 3 were the same as your 2 and 3? Their 1 was undeniably the one who made sure the win wasnt possible for you guys. Better troops and defenses aside, that is your fault for not managing the defense/offense ratio properly
Last edited by SupremeCleave; January 14th, 2017 at 10:28 PM.
O lol than I assume u retract silly statement u made that wars arent easier n that it takes "skill"?
it still does take skill ofcourse.
there are some wars where you get it easy and some where you dont. granted engineers may get more of them
i looked at the enemy s log when i was there and they had lots of wars won by very close margins.
Last edited by SupremeCleave; January 14th, 2017 at 10:45 PM.
O ok I meant "minimal to at best marginal" skill. Just bc it was close war doesnt necessarily mean it was a tuff war. Also possible people messed up which made it close. All I know is the frequency of easier wars engineers get far outweighs non engineer clans no?
tbh the enemy clan was not too engineered compared to other hyper clans. their record is not as good as DLs
Visit our new mismatch
#90UQJGJC
Dark Assassins
So what could be done to prevent such mismatches from happening again? Quite disheartening to go into battle and know there's no chance in winning. Again, I do not have anything against engineering, just that the matchmaking system needs to be fixed.
Come on now, 4 pages of mismatch discussion, and the result ended up with a loss on %? While I don't disagree that the match up could have been more equal, most people don't realize that while the mm purpose is to match clans with similar strengths, it is also designed to allow reasonable inequality in order to make wars challenging and interesting. I believe the inequality in this match up was reasonable.
My last war had something similar: enemy n1 was a 84K Th10, while our top offense was a TH9. As expected, there was zero chance we could get a perfect score while enemy could have perfect score us. Yet we never complained and won. I guess a lot of these mismatch discussion depend on the person's attitude and how they perceive the match ups.
No we lost 74-71. And the whole point of the thread and as well as onyx's diagnosis which is totally accurate, the absolute best that we coulda done was tie and lose on percent. And that should never happen in any clan war. Both teams should have the same opportunity to win a war.
Posting Permissions
