Worst War Matchup In History! .5 Gone Wild!

[sneddy]

If 2-7 are offensively lopsided TH11s, your TH10s should be able to 3 star. If they can't, you guys are lopsided on the defensive side of the equation...

Tbh i think the mystery is solved, they take a load of trash th10s into war, let the war search run forever, and are then amazed they get an unfavourable match up. Not much to see here tbh

[cnaf]

"Top decides the war" is the biggest reason why .5 is just as ridiculous as "engineered" bases

And what about those maxer clans that place 3 completely maxed TH11s at the top of the map...and stick a bunch of weak, low weight TH6s at the bottom to lessen overall weight. How about those clans?

Same principle applies there. Same tactic. Top deciding the war, and don't care about the rest getting tripled- but funny how nobody seems to mention this tactic...it being maxers and all. Just a different kinda maxing.

[bryanw1995]

They are equal, their bases match our bases, the SAME war weight basically.

Enemy 2-7 must be pretty heavily engineered if your 8-30 are all basically the same. Did they completley forgo infernos and xbows on all of them?

[Adyanthaya]

Yep its a crazy match up you've got. Save your loot n don't attack if you think you guys don't stand a chance.

[Runny]

Just seems like sour grapes to me against a clan that has played within the rules of the game and designed a better war clan than yours.

This. People want to ruin the game because they got a bad match lol. It happens, keep upgrading your offense and get over it.

[bryanw1995]

Update:
Our #3 in war is a town hall 10 with level 1 xbows and level 1 infernos. Their #3 is a town hall 11 with maxed warden, maxed queen, and a level 34 King.

Our #1 is a town hall 10 with level 1 infernos and level 3 xbows. Their #1 is a maxed town hall 11 with maxed defense, heroes, offense.

They have 7 town hall 11's, we have none. There is no way this matchup is even remotely fair, permanent .5 bases ruining wars as usual. The bottom of the map is equal, we do not have an advantage there.

In in the last 20 wars we are 15-5, they are 19-1. Don't think that matches up too closely either, the war search lasted 45 minutes. What gives?

Please send me a pm, I'd like to look at your war if that's ok with you. Something sounds really weird about this matchup, makes me wonder if perhaps SC is tinkering with the mm in preparation for Sept update?

[CasualPleb]

And what about those maxer clans that place 3 completely maxed TH11s at the top of the map...and stick a bunch of weak, low weight TH6s at the bottom to lessen overall weight. How about those clans?

This is the next quest for SC. As I said in a previous post, if the war would be finer balanced on the top 20%~ and less on the lower part, the queue times should still be good and the overall match ups better.
There is a lot to consider, I just think that engineering, .5 and the problem you just mentioned are a lot easier to fix (even with proper queue times in mind) than SC makes it seem.

The overall problem remains, that this stuff should in no way be a legit strategy with proper balancing in mind.

[bryanw1995]

I have had to sacrifice to get decent war matchups. I have stopped upgrading new defences till i get upgraded troops. Do you know how tough it is to be smashed by th9 barch every time you open your game?

Use a war base, bury your cc in the middle, and put valks in cc every time. There are plenty of th9's that will panic and screw up a raid when they see 3 max valks headed their way.

Have stated numerous times in this thread PERMANENT .5 bases are the problem, they do this for an unfair advantage in war. I see this in mixed clan wars almost every war, defenseless bases and permanent .5 bases.

fyi, your opponents didn't have 10.5's sitting at slots 2-7...a 10.5 has max th10 defense and th11 offense, there's no way they have 14 inferno towers. Your problem in this war is not with .5's, it's with a hardcore engineered clan. At least, that's my guess based upon the information presented thus far.

[JtB]

Exactly, and without much information on the weights of other bases on the map. We only have the #1 weight for each side, there is no way we could even begin to call this an actual mis-match.

Do the other 6 TH11 have an Eagle, 4th xbow, extra Wizard Tower, Archer Tower, or cannon? Level 4 IT's.

What TH are No. 8 - 30?

We have town 9's from 9-15. They have town hall 9's from 9-16. The bottom bases match up, they are basically the same.

Our top town hall 9 has level 1 xbows with a war weight of 63,000. Their top town hall 9 has level 3 xbows and better defenses than our top 9.

[ReplicantRachel]

OP it is hard to tell if your clan is facing a war mismatch with the info you are giving.

Lets say your enemy's first 7 bases are impossible for your team to 3 star, considering enemy's first 7 can 3 star your first 14 (big burden to the top bases), there must be 7 impossible bases (for your opponent to 3 star) in your lineup as well only they are somewhere in the middle. Those 7 impossible bases of yours might look very ordinary and 3 starrable but without any more heavy hitters left the enemy can't do much. Of course this is just me imagining what your war match may look like.

That's why some of us are interested in the whole lineup. The more info you give the more everyone learns to assess war matchmaking

Don't give up just yet

Here's an excellent example of a constructive thread http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...ghlight=purity