Worst War Matchup In History! .5 Gone Wild!

[Lunaticfringe]

Their #1 is a maxed defense town hall 11, our #1 is a town hall 10 with a war weight of 82,000. Yes, we can easily get 1 star on their #1, but he will 3 star our top 2. War is lost right there even if we 3 star all of their other bases. How does a maxed town hall 11 match with an 82,000 war weight town hall 10. How does a clan with 7 town hall 11's match a clan with none?

That's exactly what we are trying to figure out.

This really isn't that complicated.

tell you what--go ahead and post all 30 bases, on each side, that shows both troops and layouts. Then, you can get a bunch of people comment/speak somewhat intelligently about it.

Otherwise, continue to bang your head into the wall, as we can't help you with incomplete information.

As a matter of fact, absent that, it starts to suggest BIAS and you having an AGENDA if you don't. You keep repeating the same thing, over and over, without posting all relevant facts.

We are 15-5 in our last 20 wars. The stock replies from pro .5 and engineers isn't working here.

What's this supposed to mean? That the clan is studly or something?

[sneddy]

Awww... my th10 is fully maxed offence except 1 lvl on bk, fully maxed defence, and just 140 odd magmas left to do, but nvm eh? Whatever comforts you

[CasualPleb]

And the MM "shudn't" match TH to TH at all.

It certainly shouldn't, but a (no1) th10 shouldnt be matched up vs a th11 with proper troops and defense.
The MM should consider better match ups at the top, it could be less tolerant in the bottom.
There are just too many options to fix everything.

[bryanw1995]

Our war search went for 45 minutes, not too long. Didn't think such a heavy mismatch could happen in less than an hour.

I typically restart my war search after 15 minutes, 45 minutes seems like forever.

[JtB]

JtB did the enemy have a bunch of lower level fillers or something? if they didnt its just a bad match and its frankly its pretty terrible.

but really, dont run bad th10s.

Our lower bases are basically even. We are 15-5 in our last 20 wars, bad town hall 10's wouldn't do that good.

[ChiefTuk]

If 2-7 are offensively lopsided TH11s, your TH10s should be able to 3 star. If they can't, you guys are lopsided on the defensive side of the equation...

[orangemojo]

It certainly shouldn't, but a (no1) th10 shouldnt be matched up vs a th11 with proper troops and defense.
The MM should consider better match ups at the top, it could be less tolerant in the bottom.
There are just too many options to fix everything.

if you notice last war update, sc made the top place more emphasis. i suspect it could happen again but more heavily or broader

[1starspecialist]

OP- I'd really like to come over to your clan and see this, especially the weights on war day. A maxed TH11 with EA....you should have never matched with that, having no 11s yourselves. PM?

U can come over and see our war weights...I'm number 1 in our war..th10 with L2 infernos L3 xbows and all traps maxed a L13 canon and at....their 1..alost maxed th11..just needed to finishow walls..but all def maxed and had EA with max heroes and troops

[ElectroWizzard]

No, actually, they don't. It's far, far easier to manipulate the MM by simply including some really "low" THs into the lineup, like a TH3-5, in a war that is predominately TH9 or higher. .5s don't even remotely cause the issues that this trick does. Granted, you often are throwing away some attacks, but, as most understand, wars are often won at the top of the map, so it's an easy decision to do so

And the MM "shudn't" match TH to TH at all.

Exactly, and without much information on the weights of other bases on the map. We only have the #1 weight for each side, there is no way we could even begin to call this an actual mis-match.

Do the other 6 TH11 have an Eagle, 4th xbow, extra Wizard Tower, Archer Tower, or cannon? Level 4 IT's.

What TH are No. 8 - 30?

[Polaris]

Supercell needs to do something about .5 bases, specifically permanent .5 bases who refuse to upgrade defenses so they get an unfair advantage in war. This current war against a Chinese clan is absurd, they have 7 town hall 11's and we have 0! Not only do they have 7 town hall 11's to our 0, they are on a 15 win streak! How does a clan on a 15 win streak get such a heavy mismatch in THIER favor? Our war is 30 vs 30.

Our #1 is a town hall 10 with a war weight of 82,000.
Their #1 is a maxed town hall 11 with all maxed defenses (eagle artillery, xbows, infernos), maxed heroes and troops.

Their 2-7 are all town hall 11's with wardens, nearly maxed heroes and high offense.
Our 2-7 are weak town hall 10's with average offense.

Their 1-7 will easily 3 star our 1-14. Our bases have no chance to do the same to them.

My maxed town hall 11 wars with another clan, and guess what? The wars in that clan are the same, nothing but defenseless bases and .5 bases on the enemy team! Supercell, is this how you intended wars to be? Whoever has the most defenseless and .5 bases wins the war?

Solutions:

1) Add weight to town hall so defenseless bases no longer work.

2) After a month at a new town hall the war weight will automatically go up as if all new defenses were built. A month is long enough to upgrade offense. Permanent .5 bases are ruining clan wars.

3) Add weight to offense, by lowering the weight of offense you ENCOURAGE defenseless and .5 bases.

Just to point out at say th11 a month is not quite enough to upgrade much offense....assuming no gemming your lab is 7 days, with the length of useful lab upgrades you're looking at one troop upgrade within that month.