Leader of Bellum Tigers #2CR0QQC
Expert Goblin Butterknife Attacker
I just don't see a valid argument against it. If one person does its, it's fine, but if everyone who is upgrading a th does it it's an exploit? Maxing out walls is a defensive upgrade, just like xbows is. The difference is a smart war clan prioritizes which upgrades to do first.
Last edited by Derpologist; September 7th, 2016 at 01:02 AM.
LVL 198 \TH11 \AQ45 \BK45 \GW20
GG 1.7B \EE 1.9B \HH 14M
No, pay specific attention to what I said. I didn't say it "was" or "wasn't," which is what you are trying to twist the discussion into. I purposely used the word, "suspect." It is highly suspect. Now, it may turn out not to be when the war map is evaluated as a whole, but the fact remains that it likely is. Do you deny this?
Ehh, that's not really the same thing. Extremes of most anything are problematic and I'd consider defenseless far more problematic than 0.5s. I wouldn't use the old, "You can't get a little bit pregnant" argument here, for the degree matters here and matters a lot.
That said, I say let the defenseless bases rock and roll and keep everything similar, just hope that SC overwhelmingly considers strength at/near the top of the war map. When those bases can't bully, while not perfect, complaints will decrease significantly.
Hardly. This makes little, if any, sense.
Last edited by Lunaticfringe; September 7th, 2016 at 01:15 AM.