Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 74

Thread: Three QOL Features I'd Like to See Added in Clash

  1. #51
    Pro Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    702
    Quote Originally Posted by awesomeboy33 View Post
    Agree with the first one and 3rd one.I don't agree with the copy base feature because one designs a base with a lot of hard work and invests a lot of time in it.I would like to see most of them design their own bases and not to copy the other guys base which required hard work.Earlier there was no village edit mode,now its there,we got new features added too.We should be happy with whatever we've got.This is my opinion.
    People take screen shots and copy bases all the time. Do you think your base is so amazing that everyone is going to copy it and it will be an Internet base? All bases aren't going to become Internet bases. People want easier friendly challenges or be able to practice on war bases they failed in. My clan as already gone through everyone's FC bases and I'm not ready to spend 5 hrs making 6 new ones

    Edit: I don't agree with number one though. Not everyone wants to be chatting all the time or get harassed for donations. Right now there is at least some privacy. You can check individual bases collectors if you really want to know who is online
    Last edited by SpeakerForTheDead; May 29th, 2016 at 02:05 PM.

  2. #52
    Ashlain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,967
    Thanks for all the feedback guys!

    It seems like 3 is a no brainer (no opposition) and 1 & 2 have some concerns.

    Let me clarify that the copy base feature would not copy traps but rather just the walls and units. Something you can obviously still do on your own via screenshot and building. So this wouldn't effect base building originality but rather provide a shortcut to a process that it currently painstakingly tedious.

    It seems like number 1 has received the most negative feedback (I'm a little surprised as it was so well received in Clash Royale). I think it's a nice tool for leaders to address inactive times and recruit accordingly. It hasn't been rules out (seeing just the number of online people at a given time) as I've had a few precursory conversations with the Clash & Royale team about why one does have it an the other does not. I think they'd be open to including it but are unsure if it's wanted. I wouldn't say I'm passionately in favor of it but it certainly would be well received by my clans for the reasons I previously mentioned.

    I think I'll table ideas 1 & 2 temporarily and make all my proposed adjustments center around Friendly Challenge. I truly appreciate you all taking the time to respond. Have a great Memorial day for those in the states!

    Don't Be Toxic!
    Leader of Elite Nation Alliance
    Youtube channel - Clash with Ash
    YouTube Thread
    Here on the Forums
    Visit my website! www.clashwithash.com

  3. #53
    TH9 Tourney Winner TADP0LE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Hiding in the exposed town hall! Because it's the town hall!
    Posts
    1,311
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashlain View Post
    Thanks for all the feedback guys!

    It seems like 3 is a no brainer (no opposition) and 1 & 2 have some concerns.

    Let me clarify that the copy base feature would not copy traps but rather just the walls and units. Something you can obviously still do on your own via screenshot and building. So this wouldn't effect base building originality but rather provide a shortcut to a process that it currently painstakingly tedious.

    It seems like number 1 has received the most negative feedback (I'm a little surprised as it was so well received in Clash Royale). I think it's a nice tool for leaders to address inactive times and recruit accordingly. It hasn't been rules out (seeing just the number of online people at a given time) as I've had a few precursory conversations with the Clash & Royale team about why one does have it an the other does not. I think they'd be open to including it but are unsure if it's wanted. I wouldn't say I'm passionately in favor of it but it certainly would be well received by my clans for the reasons I previously mentioned.

    I think I'll table ideas 1 & 2 temporarily and make all my proposed adjustments center around Friendly Challenge. I truly appreciate you all taking the time to respond. Have a great Memorial day for those in the states!
    Tell SC to let heroes be usable in FC while upgrading!

  4. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    101
    I would like to see this thread in the Idea's and features section. A game specialist quickly told a new member earlier that their thread belonged there. What about this one?

  5. #55
    Forum Champion Martvol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    5,088
    Ash,
    What about challenge stays active after Pierson logs out or multiple attacks per challenge?

  6. #56
    Pro Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Martvol View Post
    No to number 1. Yes on 2 & 3.


    More important then your list is:

    challenge stays active when requester goes offline.

    More than one person can attack a request.

    One person can attack a request multiple times.

    I totally agree!!! 👆👆👆

  7. #57
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    282
    Quote Originally Posted by Martvol View Post
    Ash,
    What about challenge stays active after Pierson logs out or multiple attacks per challenge?
    Yep, this please! I don't want to wait on the app for someone to attack.

  8. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashlain View Post
    Thanks for all the feedback guys!

    It seems like 3 is a no brainer (no opposition) and 1 & 2 have some concerns.

    Let me clarify that the copy base feature would not copy traps but rather just the walls and units. Something you can obviously still do on your own via screenshot and building. So this wouldn't effect base building originality but rather provide a shortcut to a process that it currently painstakingly tedious.

    It seems like number 1 has received the most negative feedback (I'm a little surprised as it was so well received in Clash Royale). I think it's a nice tool for leaders to address inactive times and recruit accordingly. It hasn't been rules out (seeing just the number of online people at a given time) as I've had a few precursory conversations with the Clash & Royale team about why one does have it an the other does not. I think they'd be open to including it but are unsure if it's wanted. I wouldn't say I'm passionately in favor of it but it certainly would be well received by my clans for the reasons I previously mentioned.

    I think I'll table ideas 1 & 2 temporarily and make all my proposed adjustments center around Friendly Challenge. I truly appreciate you all taking the time to respond. Have a great Memorial day for those in the states!
    there are no concerns to 1&2 its all good
    they saying that 1 is ruled out but its not

    tbh i dont see any problem with any of your idea and yea these features will definately help alot of ppl

    please make it happen

  9. #59
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by TADP0LE View Post
    Tell SC to let heroes be usable in FC while upgrading!
    And in war.

  10. #60
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,122
    The 3rd idea is fine but I don't agree with the first two. I don't actually want my clan to know if I'm online or not.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •