Three QOL Features I'd Like to See Added in Clash

[ProfChaos]

1. This is a terrible idea! More problems than it's worth. It will just turn into cry baby kiddos wondering why no one wants to chat or over zealous leaders ranting about war attacks or members complaining in chat about why no is donating them a golem etc etc etc.

2. No thanks. I'd rather see SC build bases and issue daily/ weekly challenges or expand the goblin trails or anything else innovative, but, certainly not giving us easy access to others hard work as you suggest.

3. Sleeping CC is long overdue.

[ChiefAvalon]

I agree with all three ideas. Number 3 adds nicely to a thread I posted earlier, because I think not only the clan castle but all troops should be selected for friendly battles just before the attack, without wait time and without elixir cost. Because when trying fun attacks you end up with crappy compositions filling your camps. Friendly battles are one of the best features in Clash Royale and mainly because it is doable without cause and great ease.

[awesomeboy33]

Agree with the first one and 3rd one.I don't agree with the copy base feature because one designs a base with a lot of hard work and invests a lot of time in it.I would like to see most of them design their own bases and not to copy the other guys base which required hard work.Earlier there was no village edit mode,now its there,we got new features added too.We should be happy with whatever we've got.This is my opinion.

[B00024228]

I agree with 1- as long as it does not turn into tracking of members. But in the end serious players will gravitate towards serious clans with tracking leaders and players who log in once in a while will go to less active clans.
I am all for 2-. I am terrible at base design, so i took a base of the internet but it took me like 20-30min to reproduce it right. THIS IS A GAME, so players should be able to learn their own style by trying out other bases. In the end as long as I can see a base i can copy it - they are not patented. So making them being able to be copied would help the vast majority of players while NOT hurting the other. I love comments of awesome base designers thinking theirs will become "popular on the Internet". Is this not the basis of education?
And i love 3- since i already seem to have different troop composition for war versus farming. Adding FC and this becomes a mess. The "sleeper" castle becomes awesome.

[CanadianLegend]

I agree with 2 and 3 but disagree with 1.

about 1) One word: Privacy! Besides, it doesn't take more than a simple "who's online?" in the chat to find out how many people are online, no? And just because someone is online doesn't mean you can count on him to do anything ... he could be driving on the highway and just trying to collect his DE drills before he gets raided for collectors.

about 2) Everyone is copying bases anyway so why make it more difficult to everyone? It's all about free markets and free flow of information, if anyone wants to copy any base he should be able to, in the grand scheme of things everything should still balance out in the end :-)

about 3) This is pretty obvious and I have no doubt that SC will make this happen in one of the upcoming updates. Give them some credit, even they can't do everything at once!

[Superfinch30]

#3 is the important one.

Not just for FC, but that's one more step towards being able to have something like live PvP instead of clouds for legends.

[fre3dom]

1) Member Online Count
I personally will enjoy this addition. It can promote activity in clan while also keep privacy for each member since you don't know who's online

2) Copy Base Feature
Personally I don't want people to easily steal/copy bases if the owner didn't allow it. If you want to do it, do it the hard way (ss+normal building) because the real owner use his time to think/design that base.
as i said, exception should be for clan mates/global dudes if you decide to share the design for others

might be off topic, but I'll enjoy more slot for bases, especially with 24 hours cooldown before FC. I wouldn't mind for the addition to be linked with builders (buying 1 builder = opening 1 more bonus slot for base)

3) Saved defensive troops for FC clan castles
yes.

might be off topic, talking about FC in general I would also like for a customization in FC.
How many challenges that you want to give? It's much easier that way for base testing. and of course. FC when offline

/my opinion

[N1NJ4W4RR10R]

1) im assuming you mean the total amount? If so i think this would be a good idea, especially with the fc.

2) as much as some would hate it, the amount of people copying bases is fairly high already. Heck, i got my war base from an opponent in war

3) to be honest, i think that the fc should be similar to a sandbox mode, in terms of troops. It just doesnt seem right to spend elixir and de for no reward, i know a number of people in my clan dont even use it because of this. And then considering the fact the cc troop you use to attack is the same used to defend doesnt help.

Hope the feedback helps

Clash On!

[TheGneissRock]

1) Interesting. I need a bit more detail on this to see how it can work out.

2) Doesn't affect me much, I like putting effort into bases.

3) Absolutely agree with this one!

[CanadianLegend]

Personally I don't want people to easily steal/copy bases if the owner didn't allow it.

There is no concept of "ownership" for bases. Once bases are out in the wild they are essentially public, so anyone who runs into them could, in theory take screenshots, take notes of bomb/tesla/tesla locations and replicate manually or post it on a website for everyone to see. Most people are copying bases in one way or another anyway, so a "copy base" feature would save most people a lot of time, allow people to focus on more important and less tedious things (such as raiding and improving attack strategies).