Supercell needs to clarity its position on engineered / offence strong accounts

[Vikingchief]

Seeing as how engineered bases are still being used I think we can take a wild guess on their view.

if they dont make a statement, you can never be sure, look at th sniping.

[Vikingchief]

What is there to clarify? It is what it is and SC can either lower the weight on defense if they want to diminish the effects of an engineered base or continue the status quo. I seriously doubt that you will see a stated position.

read my OP, at the moment no one knows if its viewed as an exploit by supercell or not for sure, engineers believe not, anti engineered believe so. If they clarity engineering will reduce massively and many people will be happy. Engineers will also be happy since they dont waste any more time or money on a base that will become a liability in the future.

theres been a bunch of debate in this so surely clarification and communication is better for th community than an out of the blue action?

[AyanD]

Supercell revenue system, Defenceless account holders need to pay for shields and resources as they will get looted continuously while providing no shield, and must also have cc troops all the time, so needs to pay to break cc request time too.

[exeljb]

Really? Another thread about engineered clans...sheesh!

[Vikingchief]

Really? Another thread about engineered clans...sheesh!

its a thread to ask for a clarification so we dont need any more threads!!!

[R3dB3anTig3r]

Definitely an uphill battle for non-engineered clans. We no longer include our max/near max th8s in war having lost our last 2 wars to engineered clans. We will have to adapt and go 8.5/9.5 but that will take time.

[PhilISuppose]

Honestly

Just deal with it
It's not that big of a deal

What's next? You want them to have a position on people with maxed heroes as well?

[Vikingchief]

Supercell revenue system, Defenceless account holders need to pay for shields and resources as they will get looted continuously while providing no shield, and must also have cc troops all the time, so needs to pay to break cc request time too.

this is definitely a factor, but i still think they should release a statement on if they support them or if they view them as an exploit, for the sake of the war community, engineers and non engineers alike.

[Vikingchief]

Definitely an uphill battle for non-engineered clans. We no longer include our max/near max th8s in war having lost our last 2 wars to engineered clans. We will have to adapt and go 8.5/9.5 but that will take time.

and Imagine you adapt and then in 4 months engineered get nerfed. This is why we need to know if it is part of the way the game is intended to be played or not.

[VeeBirds]

Many easy ways with a simply matchmaker adjustment, iether higher weight to specific key offence, or an unfair way giving a th weight which kills premmi rushed bases with weak troops. Iether way even if you right I think supercell should offer a clear statement on engineered or offence focused bases.

Engineering offense is even easier than engineering defense. But I do wish offense would count more than it does now.
Giving TH a weight would only affect defenseless bases. The biggest deals IMO are extreme .5s or however we can call them, and purposely rushed accounts with key troops maxed