Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: TIME.. a simple solution to the +-30 seconds debate

  1. #11
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by fiftyyy View Post
    I think you should give us 15 more secs. With the latest update - with the poison spell being less effective, we have to spend more time on killing the CC troops, so its doubly harder to get 3 stars in the given time.
    I can not give you anything lol. Clearly you only read the title and didn't bother to read the whole thread. My idea has nothing to do with adding more time, but rather eliminating the time limit for raids that truly deserve the 3*s.

  2. #12
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by eternalblade333 View Post
    I very much like this idea. It will allow more balance to the game and allow no more annoying 99% ratings for the battle. I really hope this idea makes it into the game!
    Thanks for the support! I do too. Just wish this thread would pick up some more feedback. I tried changing the title but apparently I can't? The ideas forum seems to not get much attention. I may recreate this thread in general section soon and see what happens.

  3. #13
    New Guy
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mizzou...USA
    Posts
    45
    3 mins is enough time if you are attacking the base like it needs to be 4 3 stars. Why do you guys want to make war attacks easier, That's what separates the great from the good
    Last edited by JuggernautXVll; May 1st, 2016 at 05:21 AM.

  4. #14
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by JuggernautXVll View Post
    3 mins is enough time if you are attacking the base like it needs to be 4 3 stars. Why do you guys want to make war attacks easier, That's what separates the great from the good
    This thread has nothing to do with adding more time. So Congrats! You're the third person to comment without reading the thread! You win a facepalm and a shake my head....
    Last edited by DeathHopper; May 1st, 2016 at 12:19 PM.

  5. #15
    Forum Champion BbaBaba123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Whoville
    Posts
    5,468
    How would SC implement this?🤔

    I mean, it isn't awful, just slight bit confusing (extra troops, do you set that as an emergency?) but at least it isn't easily accessible

  6. #16
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by BbaBaba123 View Post
    How would SC implement this?🤔

    I mean, it isn't awful, just slight bit confusing (extra troops, do you set that as an emergency?) but at least it isn't easily accessible
    I'm not sure what you mean by extra troops. The ai for troops on the board would work similar to how the eagle artillery functions.

    If* the attacker has 50 troop capacity still up and going, then* the attack may play out regardless of time. (Assuming the other two if* criterias are met). Eagle artillery works the same way, if 150 troops are deployed....then eagle starts firing.

    Therefore, it would not be difficult to implement as the function already exists. It would be a simple matter of coding the "if, then" equation to allow for the timer to no longer end attacks.

  7. #17
    Senior Member Iainthedestroyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Sitting in my Igloo beside my pet beavers and moose while drinking a Double Double from Timmies
    Posts
    301
    I perfectly agree that if no defences are left, the attack can continue indefinitely. As for the comment on coding issues, though not the most basic, if/then coding should definitely allow for the cancellation of the timer "if no defences are left, then the timer is cancelled"
    Three rings for the Elven kings under the sky, seven for the Dwarf lords in their halls of stone, nine for mortal Men doomed to die, one for the Dark Lord on his dark throne, in the land of Mordor where the shadows lie. One ring to rule them all, One ring to find them, One ring to bring them all, and in the Darkness bind them, in the land of Mordor where the shadows lie.

  8. #18
    Forum Veteran Xav1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,639
    Quote Originally Posted by DeathHopper View Post

    I have devised an elegant solution that could make everyone happy. Using a simple "if, then" function, we could potentially take time out of the equation for great raids that deserve the 3*s, but fell a few seconds short.
    Sorry, but if you cannot 3 star within the time limit then you don't deserve the 3 stars.....simple as that.

  9. #19
    Senior Member Bman10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Climbing a tree to get better service
    Posts
    461
    I don't think the defense one should apply. I've gotten a few attacks with 95-97% and one cannon on the edge left. The troop thing is a good idea, but only for 30 seconds, if it was endless, then an 8 healer queen walk against a th10 with 4 freeze 1 rage practically would be a guaranteed 3. Troop space IDK. I think if above 90% and more than 30 space for 30 seconds, and 1 space per second otherwise as it hits 3 minutes (heroes 5 each, and as those troops die, timer still stays). I usually end with a queen and some giants with a healer(luck for the healer), but have the win easy in 30 seconds and im at 93+% usually. Have had a few where a queen walk is left to clean like a 3rd of the base with a minute left, but if my queen was higher (lvl 18 with almost all maxed troops and spells) i would've gotten it anyways (Usually against lvl 12 or 13 points, lvl 11 I can crush unless infernos cause a lot of trouble).

  10. #20
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by Xav1 View Post
    Sorry, but if you cannot 3 star within the time limit then you don't deserve the 3 stars.....simple as that.
    Its not as simple as that...or sc wouldn't have tinkered with time twice already.
    Don't get me wrong, I completely agree, but do all 99%s deserve to be 99%s? If half your army is up and all that is left is a storage with a few hp at the buzzer, then didn't you still wreck the base?
    If i completely fail on a base it's easier for me to cope with than a 99% that needed a couple extra seconds.
    This idea eliminates that possibility, while not allowing for sloppy attacks to finish.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •