Nobody would win. Basically a gem costed next. I mistyped on 300k de, more like 3K. We are a young clan. And nobody has dark troops for cc or war castle but me. (Valks agrevate th6 and below)
Nobody would win. Basically a gem costed next. I mistyped on 300k de, more like 3K. We are a young clan. And nobody has dark troops for cc or war castle but me. (Valks agrevate th6 and below)
Nope. You're not the only one. It needs to be adjusted.
Maybe my clan is lucky, but it seems pretty even. We get equal matches, highly in our favor matches, and matches where we know we will be pwned but fight to the death anyway. (Lol) To be honest, most in my clan are sad when the match is stupidly in our favor. Takes the fun out of it. And we all feel bad when the other clan doesn't even attack.
I just know from more years of gaming than I even want to try to count that people would abuse an abort button to "farm" wars. It would take forever to get a match.
Last edited by Garmonbozia; April 6th, 2016 at 02:00 AM.
I think it would be an endless loop of clans nexting wars.
TH9 | 30 AQ | 30 BK | 250 Lavas
4176 Trophies | 850+ War Stars
Clearly this could be abused, but possibly something could be implemented that would end war early in a draw if both sides agreed to it? More like a surrender button and 75% of BOTH clans have to vote for it? It would let you cycle into a new search sooner.
It would really be the case when you think you can win, and then magically the clouds appear again as the opponent decides they cant win. That would be more irritating then the case now where we know we can just do our best and fight for as much exp as possible, or just try out war attacks on bases you usually have problems with.
Nope. But sometimes the system just works in that way. There were 2 times my opponents just hit up one position and 3 stars. Just either try your best to get war exp or really just sit out the war by not donating to CCs.