Get rid of anything but 45 man wars!

[calmypal]

I would argue that 10v or 15v wars are more popular than higher number wars. There's a reason SC decided to get rid of 35v and 45v wars, they have the data. I'm sure they see that they're less popular so therefore the move to get better matchmaking. Reading between the lines but it appears that mismatches may occur more often between 35v or 45v.

However OP you raise a really good point that SC should consider. Benching add'l players isn't ideal. What I would suggest is that a clan can have MORE than 50 chiefs in the clan, perhaps 60. That should give them the buffer needed to suit up a 50 war so some people can upgrade heroes etc. To me that would be a far better solution than to get rid of 10v or 15v wars.

[Xav1]

Don't be so quick to assume I'm arrogant, I only posted this thread because there is a problem removing 45v45 wars. This isn't an "elite" (I don't even like that word) vs. casual "class" war.

You sure sound arrogant to me as noted in your OP .....

And one last suggestion to help avoid snafus like this in the future: have a liason from supercell to stay in contact with some of the more successful clans. Our clans have more people than supercell has employees. I see this and think "omg do they even play their own game what are they thinking" (no offense), but removing 45v45 shouldn't have ever been seriously considered. It's worse than th8 elixir walls, as the issues should be obvious.

What makes you think you know better than SC? Yep, definitely an arrogant statement.

[ExLooner]

However OP you raise a really good point that SC should consider. Benching add'l players isn't ideal. What I would suggest is that a clan can have MORE than 50 chiefs in the clan, perhaps 60. That should give them the buffer needed to suit up a 50 war so some people can upgrade heroes etc. To me that would be a far better solution than to get rid of 10v or 15v wars.

That's a really good idea, I like it.

You sure sound arrogant to me as noted in your OP .....

What makes you think you know better than SC? Yep, definitely an arrogant statement.

Well, I didn't mean to come off as arrogant. Do you have anything on topic to add?

[OzAudi]

no, 10 and 15 man wars are good for small clans.

^^^^
This

The little clans just have to grab a few more people. That's far more reasonable than removing functionalty and handicapping the top war clans.

I'd rather they not do this at all, but the penalty is far less severe my way.

My clan has 26 members. We often run with 10v10 or 15v15 by choice and rarely face anything approaching mismatch or bunnies. We vary or war roster between th6-th9 and th9-11.

We don’t have CW issues, you do. So why should we be forced to change when smaller wars don’t have the most complained about issues ?

[31rambo]

Removing 10 and 15 man wars makes even less sense. Those two options take the smallest amount of time to find a matchup, so obviously there are more clans searching in those categories.

[ExLooner]

^^^^
This



My clan has 26 members. We often run with 10v10 or 15v15 by choice and rarely face anything approaching mismatch or bunnies. We vary or war roster between th6-th9 and th9-11.

We don’t have CW issues, you do. So why should we be forced to change when smaller wars don’t have the most complained about issues ?

My clan had 26 members too at one point. You plan on staying at 26?

Removing 10 and 15 man wars makes even less sense. Those two options take the smallest amount of time to find a matchup, so obviously there are more clans searching in those categories.

That suggests there are very large pools of players there, just the thing to redistribute elsewhere.

[Theprimeone9]

To make you happy, we would have to deal with more threads whining about the EVEN LONGER war search times