Active/Inactive

[GudduCOC]

I was thinking these days that many players are league-less because of two reasons. First, too less trophies and the second, inactive players. So, there is an easy way to solve the problem that whenever a player is inactive for 2 weeks or so, his name becomes red and active players have green font color in their names. That is the best way to prevent taking inactive player out and the good ones in. And those who say it is ruled out, i have already read the stickies and if it really ruled out, then sc must update them.
With hope for update
GudduCOC

[ThatKlingonKid]

I like your idea, except for the color, because your own name is always green, which is done to make it stand out from the others. maybe inactive players get a red font and active players get the regular font.

[OzAudi]

I was thinking these days that many players are league-less because of two reasons. First, too less trophies and the second, inactive players. So, there is an easy way to solve the problem that whenever a player is inactive for a week or so his name becomes red and active players have green font color in their names. That is the best way to prevent taking inactive player out and the good ones in. And those who say it is ruled out, i have already read the stickies and if it really ruled out, then sc must update them.
With hope for update
GudduCOC

Define Active/Inactive please. A week isn't as long as you might think for many people who are weekend warriors. For instance, we currently have two people who are active most weekend but not weekdays AND they both went away this last weekend. We already knew from clan chat but they would show as inactive under your proposal.

A player showing as League-less simply hasn't attacked in that particular season. It doesn't mean they aren't participating in harvesting collectors, chat, donating, warring or single player.

A player who is not entering the game at all, will have larger amounts of god,elixir and de in mines, collectors and drills. All view-able when you visit their village.

What is your goal ? To fire up clan chat ? To ensure participation in war ? It's pretty obvious in my clan chat who is active, who isn't active and who will really want war, who doesn't really want war. And you want people who communicate in chat rather than rely on a semi-automated system (including opt in/opt out status for war).

SC might view this as a variation of "who is on-line" and that is definitely ruled out.


edit...
This from the stickie...
Frequently Requested:
*Indicate last online date

Your proposal is just a variation of this so I suggest it *is* currently ruled out.

[pacomius]

i think it is a good idea. we have had to kick a few co-leaders and send them invites when they had to be inactive for long, because a few times someone mistakenly took them to war. they always returned back to clan when the logged in again, but maybe waiting 2 weeks before automatically marking a player inactive e opted out for war would be a nice compromise considering those who a regularly away for days for various purposes

[GudduCOC]

I like your idea, except for the color, because your own name is always green, which is done to make it stand out from the others. maybe inactive players get a red font and active players get the regular font.
your own name's background is green but the font color (i.e. text color) is normal but active players get it dark green and the inactive ones get it red.

Define Active/Inactive please. A week isn't as long as you might think for many people who are weekend warriors. For instance, we currently have two people who are active most weekend but not weekdays AND they both went away this last weekend. We already knew from clan chat but they would show as inactive under your proposal. Okay 2 weeks are enough

A player showing as League-less simply hasn't attacked in that particular season. It doesn't mean they aren't participating in harvesting collectors, chat, donating, warring or single player. that is why i am putting this active inactive thing to sort out who is active and not attacking etc. cause these players are many times left out for war

A player who is not entering the game at all, will have larger amounts of god,elixir and de in mines, collectors and drills. All view-able when you visit their village. means i have to check 25 people for a war that they are active or not?

What is your goal ? To fire up clan chat yes? To ensure participation in war yes? It's pretty obvious in my clan chat who is active, who isn't active and who will really want war, who doesn't really want war. And you want people who communicate in chat rather than rely on a semi-automated system (including opt in/opt out status for war half of them dont use it).

SC might view this as a variation of "who is on-line" and that is definitely ruled out. its not at all a variation of that just active and inactive players for war and better kick out.


edit...
This from the stickie...
Frequently Requested:
*Indicate last online date.
indiacting last online date is toooo complex then this idea
Your proposal is just a variation of this so I suggest it *is* currently ruled out.

my answers are in redplease reply now.

[GudduCOC]

i think it is a good idea. we have had to kick a few co-leaders and send them invites when they had to be inactive for long, because a few times someone mistakenly took them to war. they always returned back to clan when the logged in again, but maybe waiting 2 weeks before automatically marking a player inactive e opted out for war would be a nice compromise considering those who a regularly away for days for various purposes

thanks for it comment soon for improvements