What To Do If You Think A Clan is ♥♥♥♥♥ing?

[west77au]

Unfortunately, it's part of the game. I have seen clans that do this and still suck! Those victories are the best!

When we run into a full blown bunny factory clan that we can not beat, we just do our best to max xp and move on. Also a good time to experiment new attacks. It's frustrating, but you just got to suck it up and make the best of it.

[IbarchCollectors]

what do you use to attack? goho, lalo, aq walk?

Rofl. I didn't know bunnies had copyright on clash troops. So if you are using lava hounds and balloons you re copying bunnies. Because fairplay people would come up with lava hounds and giants. The fact that hardcore people tend to use bunnies and practice more, so they come up with tactics earlier does not mean that clashers should be thankful in any way. If bunnies did not exist the same people (bunnies) would still play clash, they would still come up with those strategies, only it might have taken them more time.

People have been playing longer than me-> they have practiced more -> cool.
People practice on multiplayer -> cool.
People practice on my base -> not cool.

You are giving TPAs too much credit. The same dedicated people would have accomplished the same without them eventually.

i don't know about self respect or integrity, but despite your verbal diarrhea, you still haven't responded to my point. the modern game of clash was created by bunnies. whether you like it or not all you're doing is copying the attacks and base designs coming from bunny land. the cutting edge attacks featured in Jake's channel are nothing more than yesterdays garbage from bunny land. and all the fp fairies line up like good little babies to suckle on that teat.

You are clearly confusing real clash with youtube. I know onehive channel hates bunnies and waves the fairplay flag. However he does not represent the whole population of clashers even if he thinks he does. I dont care what he or any other channel posts. I do care when people can see my traps in a war while I can't.

[246]

Goodness so much toxicity.. Couple points.
As much as you "know" they're modding its not proof. Even if you can't conceive any other logical reason for the 1 troop drops SC cannot take action on that basis. It's simply not solid evidence.

sharky you may be a farmer and so no your enjoyment of the game is not tied to modders Innovations. However the point still remains true, modders are not only generally the creators of the modern hybrid war attacks, but also very good attackers as well. It simply follows logic. They can do 100x more attacks in a day than you, and naturally they can mess around with any strategy no risk to cups or loot. That's something us FP clashers will never have unfortunately.

honestly until SC either removes all the incentives to mod or figures out a way to stop it entirely, modding will only continue. Your attempts to report individual players or clans while admirable are truthfully pointless in the grand scheme of things. Your really only wasting your time.

[dantoddd]

Rofl. I didn't know bunnies had copyright on clash troops. So if you are using lava hounds and balloons you re copying bunnies. Because fairplay people would come up with lava hounds and giants. The fact that hardcore people tend to use bunnies and practice more, so they come up with tactics earlier does not mean that clashers should be thankful in any way. If bunnies did not exist the same people (bunnies) would still play clash, they would still come up with those strategies, only it might have taken them more time.

People have been playing longer than me-> they have practiced more -> cool.
People practice on multiplayer -> cool.
People practice on my base -> not cool.

You are giving TPAs too much credit. The same dedicated people would have accomplished the same without them eventually.



You are clearly confusing real clash with youtube. I know onehive channel hates bunnies and waves the fairplay flag. However he does not represent the whole population of clashers even if he thinks he does. I dont care what he or any other channel posts. I do care when people can see my traps in a war while I can't.

Erm goho and lalo aren't troops. they're fairly well defined attack strategies. created by bunnies aped by fairies. as for all these atks getting innovated without bunny support, i doubt it. evidence for this is the fact that after 3 years no one from the fp community, with the possible exception of hulk, has come up with an attack strategy. Also all of this is non sequitur because its only conjecture, the reality is bunnies are the source of innovation in this game.

i used jake as an example as he's the poster child. but even if you don't watch jake the odds are if you are generally good at attacking you're copying an attack strategy bunnies created.

[IbarchCollectors]

evidence for this is the fact that after 3 years no one from the fp community, with the possible exception of hulk, has come up with an attack strategy.

This only proof that with bunnies you can do it faster. There's no need to reinvent the wheel if it is already invented. You are proving nothing with this.

PS: If you think you can't come up with lava hounds and loons without TPA I m speechless. Seems so straightforward.

[blackjack1387]

pretty much this. also, bunnies are far more pervasive than what ppl think. i have come across only a few clans that runs upwards of 15 th 10/11 bases who are still fair play. the ratio at that level is probably 80/20 in favour of bunnies

This is a huge problem, and we're seeing it as our clan has progressed to this type of level. Rarely saw these ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥s before.

[OnyxDS]

Goodness so much toxicity.. Couple points.
As much as you "know" they're modding its not proof. Even if you can't conceive any other logical reason for the 1 troop drops SC cannot take action on that basis. It's simply not solid evidence.

Please stop spreading these lies. Read the TOS. It states "suspicion" as all that is required for them to erase an account - without any discussion, or even any need to notify the player of why.

[246]

Please stop spreading these lies. Read the TOS. It states "suspicion" as all that is required for them to erase an account - without any discussion, or even any need to notify the player of why.

Perhaps I should have worded it differently, SC "wont" take action with only your screen shots of 0% attacks. Sure its within their rights to ban anyone they so much as suspect as breaking any of the tos, that would include people with multiple accs, which btw is breaking tos . The fact is they wont and do not go around indescribably banning based on circumstantial (and may i say) weak evidence. 0% attacks while telling are not proof of modding, at least not proof SC is willing to ban over.

[blackjack1387]

Perhaps I should have worded it differently, SC "wont" take action with only your screen shots of 0% attacks. Sure its within their rights to ban anyone they so much as suspect as breaking any of the tos, that would include people with multiple accs, which btw is breaking tos . The fact is they wont and do not go around indescribably banning based on circumstantial (and may i say) weak evidence. 0% attacks while telling are not proof of modding, at least not proof SC is willing to ban over.

I shared the screen shots you laughably call weak evidence. From what you seem to be saying, we should all mod and shut up about it, is that right? I emailed my complaint with the screenshot of them admitting to the crime. They suspend people for cursing in the clan description, I don't see how this is different.

[246]

I shared the screen shots you laughably call weak evidence. From what you seem to be saying, we should all mod and shut up about it, is that right? I emailed my complaint with the screenshot of them admitting to the crime. They suspend people for cursing in the clan description, I don't see how this is different.

There is a difference between the 2 sets of evidence you gave. Swearing in the clan chat can be an offensive worthy of a ban in and of itself. A picture showing it is for the most part proof that the offense happened right? Doing a 0% attack and then three starring a base is not in and of its self wrong in SC eyes. Now yes we can make the fairly obvious conclusion that this is evidence of modding but at the end of the day its not proof. SC will never ban at least on a wide scale only going by an assumption.

i do not condone modding and would never do it myself, but no i dont waste my time sending pointless reports to SC which are really only made up of circumstantial evidence that can be taken multiple ways. If thats your thing than my all means continue. It wont make a difference though.