I think we should at least get 25 of the 50 xp war sin bonus if the war comes to be a draw! And the loot bonus should be increased for draw
Printable View
I think we should at least get 25 of the 50 xp war sin bonus if the war comes to be a draw! And the loot bonus should be increased for draw
Its pretty hard to get a draw today, with the destruction percentage as tie-breaker. Don't think they need to change it actually, but increasing victory bonus would be great :p
Hands down makes sense... a 50/50 split of the winnings should be the result of a tie...
Loot has gone down significantly with the last update - where before a player could - almost - break even on Dark elixer - - almost break even on regular elixer and turn a tiny profit in gold-- now its a guaranteed GIANT loss of dark - a small loss on elixer and a ... tiny profit in gold... just to Hog a hard th8 base its going to cost you well over 1200 dark- if not 1600 when building a big golem... average dark profits on that type of base are around 800 dark... big loss... I'd say loot needs tripled at least to be worthwhile to go to war.
Loot percentages need increased all across the board - in and out of war.
I'd go more to say - if its a 'perfect' war where every star on the map is achieved - all players on both sides should get 100% of the loot.
Then use the sliding scale for loot percentages based on how much destruction there is...
Just like they are doing in the League bonuses for how much destructoin you get on a base...
This will encourage clans to perform better in clan wars...
-we do 45x45 wars all the time... most of them we get 98% average destruction... often its perfect - either way - many wars are won or lost by 1 star or a percentage tie in our clans... This is common for any clan that is th8 and under... as its pretty easy to insure 3 stars on any th8 base -- but at th9 and 10 3 star attacks become harder to get...
I would also say - the loosing clan should get Much more war loot - also based on a sliding scale of the overall clans destruction in the war.
Good suggestion - just should be more to it