Tbh the one gem trainin is more useful then collectors rn especially to adapt to the new update
Printable View
Tbh the one gem trainin is more useful then collectors rn especially to adapt to the new update
Nope
Econ 101 faster training = more elixer being burned per hour. Without boost elixer shortage would be worse than ever.
What incentive would players have had to boost troops...if there wasn't any loot to get with them? Boost a 225k army to hit a base worth 180k?
1 gem boost is gone :(
Supercell is hoping people have gotten used to the boosted troop/spell prep time & will continue to gem their barracks and spell factories. With the shortened amount of time you can play before being kicked offline combined with the fact that every raid (at least if you are in the upper leagues) is a full war raid & requires over an hour to prep, you practically have to gem boost in order to get more than a couple raids in.Quote:
Originally Posted by KinGH
Why should we do that, you can do 2 attacks while boosted, because of the huge king and queen regen time this ain't worth the amount of gemsQuote:
Originally Posted by bunnyb0y
I like boosts, but honestly im glad it is over, its a big negative impact on already destroyed economy.
waste of gems really..
I tot agree with all of tht and tht was my original thought. Its all a marketing scheem.Quote:
Originally Posted by bunnyb0y
They never ran statistics but when they did they realised most players dropped gem for barracks in champ+ cause only way to raid there is by going full