They would never admit it. In fact, it's against forum rules to even discuss exploits.
In the grand scheme none of this would matter if SC would just break their silence and communicate with the player base. I guess that is too much to ask?
Printable View
Yes, but a real CEO complains about things like shoddy treatment by airlines. They don't pretend they have some special insight into a competitor's internals and make silly pronouncements about it on internet forums. Unless their name is Mark Cuban.
All the bleaters in these forums are why most companies are not open at all about their plans. Supercell is an exception. It will be interesting to see how long they are willing to put up with this constant trashing and give up on being transparent.
Supercell collects a lot of metrics, I'm willing to bet on them making the correct adjustments based on what they see there, rather than the very small sample size here in the forums of self-selecting malcontents and dubious "CEOs".
Stop saying this update is to tackle bot issues, because it never has been. Bots are still out there, stronger than ever since now that they can also raid those juicy active bases.
You missed what I was meaning.
I was not complaining that he made his points. Or that they had been made before.
I was saying, that is one of the reasons why he got that reply, because he was making all the same points that was already made, which, if he was a CEO, that just popped in, his points would have been more original, at the very least.
That, is why I made a point, and not argued with you.
I too, think that the OP made some decent points. But to start off in a lie, claiming to be the CEO of a major gaming company, and even try to suggest which one, yet not backing it up, is not a really bright way to get SC to read your points.