18 Days, and this is where Clash stands

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nerf713

Yep, never said it was not a problem.....

Storage raids are everywhere, but collector raids are very, very rare. Probably that's why you say that there is bad loot. However, army costs are the problem here.

---

Storage raids are becoming less and less though. I haven't seen any good storage raids since last week.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goempel

Storage raids are becoming less and less though. I haven't seen any good storage raids since last week.

---

That's also another problem. Weak bases with full storages are getting more rare every day, and that basically enforces you to attack a max TH11/10/9 depending on your TH level.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nerf713

That's also another problem. Weak bases with full storages are getting more rare every day, and that basically enforces you to attack a max TH11/10/9 depending on your TH level.

---

Yeah, leaving us with no loot. They should bring back the inactive bases.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nazrhael

This is me...

http://38.media.tumblr.com/1b828434d...IsH1rp8xbw.png

---

Priceless, I love it. So many of us have been playing that way.

Game needs some serious balance love. No need to return to the snipe days. Just need loot increase and troop time and cost lowered. I am able to upgrade, however slow. I get hit really hard fairly often and it will happen. I was in masters and when it got to much to sustain my loot I dropped to silver and have done better. Would rather be in masters again but the cost of troops is too high to be able to maintain a profit.

With The lack of good loot and war bonus dropped I have stopped warring. The cost is far to high for war when it's often a loss. Suppose to be a gain on loot if you manage to win your attack (or should be at least a refunded war army amount) If I want to hit hard bases with war attacks I will simply go back to masters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nerf713

That's also another problem. Weak bases with full storages are getting more rare every day, and that basically enforces you to attack a max TH11/10/9 depending on your TH level.

---

^^ this

Those folks with crummy rushed bases are the ones that quit and have been effectively removed from the search pool. And yes, I know they have not been removed, but given such a low % chance to find them that they are effectively gone. All that are left are folks with smart bases and decent defenses who are smart enough to sink all their extra resources into wall or only collect one resource at a time to make them less attractive.

Not sure where this pyramid scheme will end, but current model is unsustainable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saleh47

I think many did it out of forums. I search too much & rarely see people having boosts on their collectors!! Really seems people did that. They might get the 1 & 2 days as well 7 extend it to 10 days if boost goes on lol

---

if boost continues I will do 14 day shield. (7+2+1, then renew 1 every 5 days, 2 after 10). It's the holidays, got family to spend time with and other toys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rahle

Priceless, I love it. So many of us have been playing that way.

Game needs some serious balance love. No need to return to the snipe days. Just need loot increase and troop time and cost lowered. I am able to upgrade, however slow. I get hit really hard fairly often and it will happen. I was in masters and when it got to much to sustain my loot I dropped to silver and have done better. Would rather be in masters again but the cost of troops is too high to be able to maintain a profit.

With The lack of good loot and war bonus dropped I have stopped warring. The cost is far to high for war when it's often a loss. Suppose to be a gain on loot if you manage to win your attack (or should be at least a refunded war army amount) If I want to hit hard bases with war attacks I will simply go back to masters.

---

I agree, but the snipe days worked. Also, sniping allowed world records to be broken by lower town hall levels. Say I were Supercell. If something works efficiently, and it pleases the community, I would leave it alone. And if I were to change it in any way, I would make it benefit the community, not harm them. What has happened since this update: The community has been demoted to a lower level of excellence and advancement. The cons outrule the pros in this update, sadly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goempel

Clash stands with a 3/5 Rating, according to Google. The majority of the community is still pretty mad, and we have absolutely no loot in the raiding pool, even with the one gem boost. Many clashers are reporting that they can not find any dead bases, I can not either. However, I still think Clash has one more shot to make things right. I hope they balance out the loot in the economy, because right now it is just not working. On that note, I have a question: Can Supercell please both sides, or can they only please one side?

---

I changed to red font the problem with your entire argument. It is also the problem with almost every argument I have seen.

If you are surviving completely off of dead bases then you were doing it wrong. Yeah, it is awesome to find a dead base every once in a while. I found one last night, 600k gold and 700k elixer. I was so excited. But a majority of my GG, EE, and HH are from getting inside the base and taking loot from storages. I get 200-300k/200-300k at a time using GiBarch troops that would work just as well for a TH8 or TH9 with a different ratio. Because of my reliance on spells with my heroes down I am simply treading water with elixer. I feel bad for you if you are hunting elixer. But if I were then I would use less spells and more troops or spells that use dark elixer. Kind of like now I dont use any DE.

You were relying on dead bases. It was an awesome perk but you became reliant on something that the game makers have stated that they did not intend. Now there are many more bases with more loot available and you have to go get it if you want it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by m4thw1z

I changed to red font the problem with your entire argument. It is also the problem with almost every argument I have seen.

If you are surviving completely off of dead bases then you were doing it wrong. Yeah, it is awesome to find a dead base every once in a while. I found one last night, 600k gold and 700k elixer. I was so excited. But a majority of my GG, EE, and HH are from getting inside the base and taking loot from storages. I get 200-300k/200-300k at a time using GiBarch troops that would work just as well for a TH8 or TH9 with a different ratio. Because of my reliance on spells with my heroes down I am simply treading water with elixer. I feel bad for you if you are hunting elixer. But if I were then I would use less spells and more troops or spells that use dark elixer. Kind of like now I dont use any DE.

You were relying on dead bases. It was an awesome perk but you became reliant on something that the game makers have stated that they did not intend. Now there are many more bases with more loot available and you have to go get it if you want it.

---

Not necessarily, just because I mentioned dead bases doesn't mean I lived off of them. I did more dead base raids than I did storage raids, yes. But to assume I live off of them is invalid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goempel

Clash stands with a 3/5 Rating, according to Google. The majority of the community is still pretty mad, and we have absolutely no loot in the raiding pool, even with the one gem boost. Many clashers are reporting that they can not find any dead bases, I can not either. However, I still think Clash has one more shot to make things right. I hope they balance out the loot in the economy, because right now it is just not working. On that note, I have a question: Can Supercell please both sides, or can they only please one side?

---

Oh no u cant find dead bases. the loot is fine. you just want a bigger profit, thats all. So they made it so you have to actually attack someone with a decent army. adapt or quit.