Printable View
I have been thinking for awhile that there should be another rank for members of the clan. Either something before elder to make elder mean a little more when you get that or a promotion between elder and CO leader. I run into the issue often when there is a member of my clan that I don't think is quite ready for CO but is also doing better then the other elders.. I just feel like there should be another step between elder and co, is there anyone else with me on this one??
I kinda agree. Prob is there is not much more things they would have access to do. Kinda like a title with no added perk.
Exactly, the only "extra" thing you could do would be to kick elder's. Unless someone would come up with something else they could do.
I just read a post by another player with the same idea and they had they idea for a few different promotions too so I think it would be cool if the promotions went like this
member
worker
elder
general
co leader
leader
as for what perks you get at every promotion i think it would be a good idea that there really isn't any difference between elder and worker as for perks the only extra perk would be elder can kick a worker. Then once you reach general you are able to start clan wars and don't have to bother a leader or co, and then as always doing anything with the clan profile will be left to leader and co leaders.
I think this would be pretty cool but would like other player opinions :)
Broadly agree. I recommend reviewing the following thread: http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...ositions-RolesQuote:
Originally Posted by Burns11
MEMBER: Everything the same but does not war.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burns11
WORKER: Can war and can kick members 1 hour cool down
ELDER: Exactly the same
General:Can send clan mail 1 day cool down can kick elders and below with 10 minute cooldown
CO-LEADER:Exactly the same
LEADER: Exactly the same except they can chose whether people are opted in or out
The leader getting to chose whether people are opted in or out helps. If you are a clan with 50 players and only do 10v10 war the leader doesn't have to go hunt down the other 40 members and tell them to opt out to make chosing the people that are going to war easier
i like the ideas except members not being allowed to war i think that they should be able to be in wars, and leaders are able to pick and choose who is in and out of the wars now. It is a great feature!Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyGator
I would like to see another rank/position being available to be given to players so that there can be a distinction between newer and long standing players.
I don't give out elder freely as in our clan they are used as a decision making position if myself or co are not available.
Co-Leader should not be able to promote others to co-leader. Also, a limited number of co-leaders (3) would save me many headaches of everyone thinking they should be a co-leader. I would so love to say there are 3 spaces and they are filled!Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyGator
I like a position called Captain or General, This position could post clan email and promote, demote, kick lower positions. The Co-Leader is too powerful. No position should be able to promote others to its same rank, that's crazy. Only someone of higher rank should control the promotion, demotion, or kicking of the Co-Leader rank. With the new intermediate leadership position in place, limit the number of co-leaders to 3 or 4. I am so tired of dealing with otherwise good players who become whiners unless you make them co. Then you have 8 or 10 people holding onto the steering wheel and you get wrecked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burns11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burns11
Hi Burns11!;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Burns11
I truly agree with your idea.:thumbsup: Promotions should be added between elder and co. But I want explanation about the 'worker' promotion. How it is beneficial for clashers? And in 'general' promotion, I don't think that general is so important in Clash because if there would be a general, there would be no co-leader, in't it?!
Thanks.:):)
krtk2000 (Clash name: Kartikay_coc)
How about:Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyGator
Leader
Co-Leader = (limit 4) Same as now except cannot promote co-leaders
General = Major plus can start war
Major = Elder plus can write clan email once every 24 hours
Lieutenant = same as current elder
Soldier = same as a current member
Member = members cannot see traps on clan mates bases allowing recruiting to continue in prep day while we are all bored
Any level can promote, demote or kick out lower levels.
how about like a "captain" or "Commander" or "general" who can kick elders and members with 1 hour codlin, can send clan mail once a day, but CANNOT start wars. Also, members cannot see traps or teslas or troops inside classmate's clan castles.
I think it's an easy way to improve the game. Giving clan members something extra to work for should improve the clans ability to operate and flow smoothly.... especially for war. It's only a title under the name. It shouldn't require much of an update.
For example: Elder> Veteran> Coleader> Leader.
Hello, I also agree to put at least two more names of members of the clan, with which there is short, and the name is the least.
to be honest: I'd rather have an extra rank between member and elder right now.
But maybe we could have: (basing on ranks already send in this thread)
Leader (same)
co-leader (same)
general (same as co-leader but can't promote eachother)
leutenant (same as in post above)
*extra rank* (Rank pure for the title, can't do anything more than the soldier)
soldier (same as in post above)
I don't need the member of the post above. Its fine if they have a 'new-tag' which has the same effect.
You'd only promote people to co-leader you really trust (your right hand). the new co-leader can promote other people to co too. But the general has the same rights, except that he can't promote other people to general and/or co-leader.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burns11
Yeah I agree with you !