Printable View
I have been wondering how supercell could have released such a horrible update and then I had an idea. Maybe they are getting pressure from SoftBank to make more money. So they chose to create a money making update that would tick of a large percentage of their players and thus decrease profits. Kindof as a way of telling SoftBank to keep their hands off the game? Then once SoftBank backs off they simply revert back to some of the old code.
That is exactly correct my friend.Softbank is pressuring them to make it pay to play. This is what Softbank does. They have dine it to numerous games I have played in the past. The funny thing is too the old games I used to play I quit because of Softbank doing their same ♥♥♥♥.Quote:
Originally Posted by Muzingu
What other games does SoftBank own (I understand rule 6 but technically they're not competitors as SB is a parent company)Quote:
Originally Posted by EragonBromsson
Do you think people are spamming and cluttering the general subforum with the exact same threads that don't help intentionally?
They own games like puzzles and dragons and rage of bahamut and more .Quote:
Originally Posted by Radiating
Some people are saying that Softbank pressured this update in prupose to make the game fail, and SC go bankrupt, so they can buy the 23% remaining (Theey already own 73) in a ridiculously low price, and own all SC active, passives, IT, servers, human resources, etc.
The whinners say that... And I couldn't laught at them more!
Not cluttering, but letting supercell know that there avoiding dealing with the issue will not solve the problem. But how many of the update supporters are supercell employees? That is another thing that I have often wondered.
The truth goes through three stages. The first is being ridiculed.Quote:
Originally Posted by PleasantBird