Printable View
I keep reading that the problem with the update is that it's removed too much loot from the game's economy. But what if we're thinking about it all backwards like?
Seriously, keep the update and drop the cost of all upgrades by about 75%. Loot will still be harder to come by but a) you won't need as much of it and b) you won't need to try and hoard it for so long...
People will raid and upgrade, and all balance will be restored.
This would create a lot of problems in the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodez
Problems for who? The people who aren't already walking away?
1. Some have upgraded these buildings at a higher cost and would be angry that others don't have to do the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodez
2. Lower costs would mean everyone will hold less loot, resulting in a worse economy.
3. The game may advance too quickly and it should be very difficult to max.
1. Let them cry. The game is not static, and clearly there are winners and losers with every change.
2. What's the good of an economy that only the truly powerful can enjoy?
3. It still would. But as it stands, why would I bother to raid if I'm actually never going to be able to upgrade?
I gave this update the benefit of the doubt, but for now I think I'm done.
Let me know when they switch the game-play dial back to "fun". Plenty of ways it could be done if they want to.
1. So you're saying that supercell should give you what you want and disregard anyone else's feelings of the matter?Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodez
2. I'm unsure how this is related? Lowering costs for the more powerful would lower the available loot for the more powerful... On an unrelated note, welcome to America.
3. This is why they should increase the loot bonus.
If only America was the world.
*beats head against wall*
Have you not realised the flaw in what you said? Those maxed th10s or something that may be mad if this happened, were able to max out, when they were still able to gain high amounts of loot. So think about it, doesn't this mean it wld be unfair for all those un-maxed people too? However, lowering the cost wld indeed come with problems. 1. Collectors wld become very op, considering you cld get like 100k of each resources from the collectors every around 4-5hs, If you do the math, that wld equate to about, perhaps, 400k of each resource everyday, taking away resources that have been looted. Thats enough to upgrade something if the cost was lowered by 75%.
Omg.. People can't think these days and are such hogs.
75%!? You crazy? Gemmed maxed bases would be worth less and would create less profits.
SC didn't want huge profits with cheap armies and is why they removed sniping and most dead bases, get use to it or just quit.
Maybe that's one of them ambit claims you sometimes hear about...?Quote:
Originally Posted by PureEnergy66