Please update Chess too

Like Clash of Clans, Chess is a beloved game by many, but it is far from perfect. We could attract more people to play the game if we made some tweaks. We shouldn't care about those people that love how it is, though. They will get used to the changes.

I propose Supercell make the following changes to Chess:

1) It never made sense that the game ends when someone takes the King. Why can't the other pieces still fight? In the new Chess game, the game doesn't end just by killing the King.
2) Since some people like to play Chess for many hours, it could be bad for them. A mandatory nap must be taken after 3 or 4 hours of play.
3)It has been 1000 years and people are just bored with the same old pieces. Introduce something else (Sheldon) like a dungeon keeper
4) With the new pieces, the board will be too crowded, so you should also expand it.

Moral - don't think you know better than the players that love the game. It is arrogant.

What is arrogant is to think that you know the game better than the ones that made it.

Funny to think that the rules of the chess we play right now aren't the ones that ruled from the beggining.

So chess evolved too. The only problem right now with the game is the lack of loot that will be corrected and the pbt that is going to change.

Thank you OP, I knew other games had time limits but just couldn’t recall.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flexmarkman

Like Clash of Clans, Chess is a beloved game by many, but it is far from perfect. We could attract more people to play the game if we made some tweaks. We shouldn't care about those people that love how it is, though. They will get used to the changes.

I propose Supercell make the following changes to Chess:

1) It never made sense that the game ends when someone takes the King. Why can't the other pieces still fight? In the new Chess game, the game doesn't end just by killing the King.
2) Since some people like to play Chess for many hours, it could be bad for them. A mandatory nap must be taken after 3 or 4 hours of play.
3)It has been 1000 years and people are just bored with the same old pieces. Introduce something else (Sheldon) like a dungeon keeper
4) With the new pieces, the board will be too crowded, so you should also expand it.

Moral - don't think you know better than the players that love the game. It is arrogant.

---

Is chess a supercell game?

They added the super ability update of the queen 400 years ago! Before that, she was really weak, weaker than a knight.

Also if people haven't lost any pieces in ten moves, they need to take a break from the game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thekingofgoblins

Is chess a supercell game?

---

I think they bought the rights last year. :smirk:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WarcoZ

What is arrogant is to think that you know the game better than the ones that made it.

---

Actually that is not arrogant at all. My husband and I own a business. We make parts that people purchase and use on there vehicles. Now, we do a variety of tests to a part before it's added to our line of products, but we also know that if some one buys it they are going to be testing that part out way more than we can. They are also testing it out in real world application, something we don't always have time to do. Now if one person tells us "this part would be better if...." we probably won't make that change. However, if we get told over and over that a part would be better if we made a certain change, then that change is likely to get made. Why? Because the customers know best....a sentiment you don't hear very often any more.

It's the same with CoC. We are the end user and the customers of supercell. Sure they created the game, but we are the ones putting it to use and in the end we know best what makes the game fun.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TracyC

Actually that is not arrogant at all. My husband and I own a business. We make parts that people purchase and use on there vehicles. Now, we do a variety of tests to a part before it's added to our line of products, but we also know that if some one buys it they are going to be testing that part out way more than we can. They are also testing it out in real world application, something we don't always have time to do. Now if one person tells us "this part would be better if...." we probably won't make that change. However, if we get told over and over that a part would be better if we made a certain change, then that change is likely to get made. Why? Because the customers know best....a sentiment you don't hear very often any more.

It's the same with CoC. We are the end user and the customers of supercell. Sure they created the game, but we are the ones putting it to use and in the end we know best what makes the game fun.

---

You said so, you make parts, not a whole.

If i write a novel, for example, the readers, even if they were the best fans in the world, would never know and understand the characters as much as the writer. Take Harry Potter for example if you want.

They made a game to be played in a way, attack and defense, after that they implemente clan wars. Town Hall snipping was an abused way to progress in the game, boring way that should never have existed. Thas that they have done and the only problem now is the loot isn't enogh to progress and cover, at the same time, the troops cost and time they need. Once the fix this the game will be better than ever.

Oh, and the pbt, but the know thats wrong too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WarcoZ

What is arrogant is to think that you know the game better than the ones that made it.

Funny to think that the rules of the chess we play right now aren't the ones that ruled from the beggining.

So chess evolved too. The only problem right now with the game is the lack of loot that will be corrected and the pbt that is going to change.

---

I agree. That is arrogant.