Their intention, as mentioned in one of the announcement threads, was to make 'a better Clash':p:facepalm:XD
Printable View
Their intention, as mentioned in one of the announcement threads, was to make 'a better Clash':p:facepalm:XD
That is evidently not true due to the lack of making hereos avalible in war when it was by far the most requested thing. Also no adjustment to troop times or cost. When Jonas said himself in a interview with chief pat "imagine a perfect clash of clans, one where troops didn't take any time to build". He was obviously insinuating that they would never do that because the loss of money (among other things).
What is SoftBank?
It's sad in the way the game is going.
Not 51. 73%:
SoftBank Ups Its Stake In Supercell To 73% As Sole External Shareholder
http://techcrunch.com/2015/06/01/sof...-gaming-giant/
Afaik this is not supercell's fault in anyway, softbank controls supercell and probably applied preassure on supercell.
Spot on thread OP
If it was intended then it should have been made that way to start, not at the peak of its popularity. If every company did this during their highest point they would all die within weeks. Problem is that if they made the game this hard from the start no one would have been playing as long as we have. It's simplicity is what made it so popular. Small changes could have made this work, one huge dose just makes it impossible to swallow,