Ability to up the Ante to entice a Shield

As many people are already discovering, there are instances where you may go a long while without getting attacked leaving you without a shield. This causes a couple of problems:

-Uncertainty about/scheduling of clan castle troops, you have defensive ones in there but you may be prepping for a war attack, you don't want to have your friend bake a golem for you, switch, and then suddenly get attacked

-the dreaded cycle of PBT. until the mercy rule kicks in, you will keep getting booted off even though no one seems to want to attack you.

Why not let us increase the % of raidable loot from our storages on demand if we would like to entice someone to attack us?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bactgudz

As many people are already discovering, there are instances where you may go a long while without getting attacked leaving you without a shield. This causes a couple of problems:

-Uncertainty about/scheduling of clan castle troops, you have defensive ones in there but you may be prepping for a war attack, you don't want to have your friend bake a golem for you, switch, and then suddenly get attacked

-the dreaded cycle of PBT. until the mercy rule kicks in, you will keep getting booted off even though no one seems to want to attack you.

Why not let us increase the % of raidable loot from our storages on demand if we would like to entice someone to attack us?

---

Soooooooo.......

You want free shields again? Also they would get a lot less profits since people won't have to gem shields. Then we won't have Clash! -TheScavenger350

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andrewchang

Soooooooo.......

You want free shields again? Also they would get a lot less profits since people won't have to gem shields. Then we won't have Clash! -TheScavenger350

---

Ummm, did you read what I wrote at all? I want to pay MORE for my shield, cause no one is selling at the price supercell is putting it out there for me at. LOL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by andrewchang

Soooooooo.......

You want free shields again? Also they would get a lot less profits since people won't have to gem shields. Then we won't have Clash! -TheScavenger350

---

lol a "Free" shield was from getting your town hall destroyed loosing 1k resource. This idea would not give a free shield, but would make him/her loose more loot as the attacker would still have to attack and steal from a storage.

The request is to allow the end user to be able to choose the percentage of loot available.

You could just switch to an extremely raidable base, right? I'm not completely sure I understand your idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eevee46

You could just switch to an extremely raidable base, right? I'm not completely sure I understand your idea.

---

I could do that...but I don't want to just give it a way or lose trophies purposefully, I want to defend with the base I designed...and I don't feel that is in what the spirit of supercell said this update was about. I have a moderately difficult base and people won't attack it for the available loot, I'm willing to give up more resources than supercell is making me offer to those who can defeat it.


When I'm upgrading walls and heroes now, I rarely have over 1M-2M in my storages...so people coming across my base see maybe 120k-240k available loot and click next. What I am proposing is that there is a setting where I can set the available loot to say 30% instead of 12% and they will see 300k-600k available, and we have ourselves a good old fashioned clash where I get to see my base defend, they can steal the booty if they win, and I don't have to deal with the headaches above from not getting an opportunity for a shield.