POLL: Increase War Battle Time Limit

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Xropelayton

The concept of the game is designed such that you have to plan your attack in 30 seconds & 3 minutes to attack as the way you want. Now it depends on the attacker that how he/she attacks. Many players are able to finish fully in 3 minutes, they are comfortable with it, with th11 SC might think about 3:30 mins but if some of players lack in timing then it can be learned.

---

you cannot learn probability and chance... your argument is invalid... the game is designed so that it's not possible to ALWAYS win EVERY battle and as such there's currently 5 possibilities...
1. 3 star
2. less than 3 star victory all units defeated
3. less than 3 star victory out of time
4. no star loss all units defeated
5. no star loss out of time

3:30 ACTUAL battle time MIGHT be enough but it's always best to leave some room for FUTURE developement(s) / additions so 4 minutes would definetely be enought and contrary to some nay sayers out there; 4 minutes WOULD NOT BREAK THE GAME.... all it does it give the attacker a little more time and make the game more fair but someone like you is only thinking of their own defense and worried they might lose more battles if there was a little more time. I'm for more fairness and 4 minutes war battle times... regular battles is iffy... i don't yet know what all they're adding so i don't know if it'd be necessary to increase regular battle times... just war times for sure.

Yes, increasing the time limit is a good idea, but only for the higher TH levels. I would say giving an extra 30 sec to TH10 and extra minute to TH11 should be enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mznorling

Yes, increasing the time limit is a good idea, but only for the higher TH levels. I would say giving an extra 30 sec to TH10 and extra minute to TH11 should be enough.

---

This is too much added time to begin with, and giving different battle lengths for different TH levels would have people in uproar.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mznorling

Yes, increasing the time limit is a good idea, but only for the higher TH levels. I would say giving an extra 30 sec to TH10 and extra minute to TH11 should be enough.

---

someone else said that too and as i replied to them, increasing for some and not others is not a good idea...
1. it would complicate battles and replays and the overall game to have multiple different time limits
and
2. it would create a feeling of unfairness in the game with everyone who didn't get the time limit increase complaining and wanting more time...
if you do time limit change for some you have to for all.

10-15 seconds to be added is enough to 3 star a base.Otherwise it would not be challenging

...it's just most people are afraid of change even when it's for the good and they automatically cry we don't need this without giving the idea a good chance if any at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AvengerKyuubi

I usually use GoWiPe attacks and usually either i end up totally defeated with less than 3 stars or victorious with 3 stars within the current 3 minute time limit however:
1. i'm not always attacking the same person with the same base layout and regardless of whether i did everything perfect or not, there are rare times when i run out of time...
2. basically the same as #1 but reversed for someone attacking me.... sometimes in war my attacker may get 3 stars or fewer and within the current time limit of 3 minutes however sometimes they run out of time too regardless of whether they did something wrong or not... i'm advocating this increase to atleast 4 minutes for everyone to remedy this problem because obviously if anyone can run out of time, even if it's only once, even if its because of a mistake or many mistakes..... then there obviously isn't enough time ALWAYS and as such so that there isn't this problem there should be an increase. Maybe 5 minutes is too much which is why after my first few messages i've tried to refer to a 4 minute time because it would be pointless to add only 5 - 10 seconds because then somewhere down the line someone will have this complaint again... and keep in mind even though it would be 4 minutes, as you and a couple others have stated.... MOST battles can be finished in 3 minutes... you're just refusing to see that MOST is not ALL. regardless of what led to the time of the end of the battle.

---

So you want to win all the battles and not lose even a single one. If using GOWIPE's, you are able to 3 star some bases, isn't that helping the point that bases can be 3 starred in 3 minutes. No body is perfect and no body can take 3 stars all the time. Mistakes will always happen and its the beauty of the game that sometimes we have to improvise after making some mistake during the attack. If you watch cricket, you will know that T20 has only 20 overs and you have to do everything in those enthralling limited overs, but you are asking for a boring Test match and I hope you understood the analogy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BadBoy101

So you want to win all the battles and not lose even a single one. /QUOTE]If using GOWIPE's, you are able to 3 star some bases, isn't that helping the point that bases can be 3 starred in 3 minutes. No body is perfect and no body can take 3 stars all the time. Mistakes will always happen and its the beauty of the game that sometimes we have to improvise after making some mistake during the attack. If you watch cricket, you will know that T20 has only 20 overs and you have to do everything in those enthralling limited overs, but you are asking for a boring Test match and I hope you understood the analogy.

---

I fully agree Everyone wants to win all the time however I realize that's not possible, and I've stated that before, and I'm not seeing how anything I've ever said in this thread would bring you to think that I would think that... just because I'm asking for a increase to the time limit doesn't mean I think that is gonna get me or anyone a win.... what the heck are you talking about? Test match? I have never said anything about a test match... are you crossing your threads?

Hmmm, this is going to be tricky.. Ok, so avenger, I 100% get where your coming from. It's annoying, we all know it is, but it also adds this element of fun because you know that you have to be quick with your attack, however, 5-10 seconds couldn't hurt right? Yeah, I agree we could use a couple more seconds to get that last but in the corner or something. However, I don't think it matters whether someone spoke on behalf of others, I think what everyone else is trying to say is that 4-5 minutes is way too much, that is on behalf to what appears the majority, but just because someone disagrees with you dosent mean their a hater, it simply means that they would not enjoy this idea and have a different view then you. So just try to be a little more open minded and take things with a grain of salt. Thanks! :)

-ZT

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZachTyler

Hmmm, this is going to be tricky.. Ok, so avenger, I 100% get where your coming from. It's annoying, we all know it is, but it also adds this element of fun because you know that you have to be quick with your attack, however, 5-10 seconds couldn't hurt right? Yeah, I agree we could use a couple more seconds to get that last but in the corner or something. However, I don't think it matters whether someone spoke on behalf of others, I think what everyone else is trying to say is that 4-5 minutes is way too much, that is on behalf to what appears the majority, but just because someone disagrees with you dosent mean their a hater, it simply means that they would not enjoy this idea and have a different view then you. So just try to be a little more open minded and take things with a grain of salt. Thanks! :)

-ZT

---

He really did say "we don't need this" (maybe he deleted the comment idk... and I've seen people say that exact same thing so many times on so many other threads; it's one of those things that has worked it's way into my top list of things that annoy me; it's like they're saying it's their opinion it's not good and nothing else matters but their opinion and project it as if everyone else automatically agrees with them. I can't stand it when someone just assumes the whole community agrees with them. The phrase "we don't need this" should be banned as its totally disrespectful of the person and their idea it's directed to. The fact he won't admit to it irks me more. I've said it before but I'll say it again... I would've been ok if he had said "I don't think it's needed" and for whatever reason; and I would've reacted better on my rebuttal argument had it been that way and we wouldn't be at or over 100 comments LoL. As I was taught there's constructive criticism and there's destructive criticism. He started it with his destructive criticism and I may have a tendency to focus back destructive criticism onto the original criticizer with the intent of getting them to see the err in their ways.