New ideas to help clans out.

My first idea I can't take credit for and that is because one of my co's by the name of bladefist suggested it. That idea would be the ability to add a new player in place of one who bails during a war. As examples I have had numerous new members quit after being added into a war. With the ability to replace them in that war it would balance out clan wars. My second idea I might just post on the forums tho and that is a player black list. Basically here's the thought , got a few idiots who hopped quit during war , maybe didn't attack? Add them to the black list for all clans to see. Match it up with a recruit you found and you may have crossed paths with someone else's troublemaker. Ofcourse it would require using player I.d. numbers but I think it could help the entire clash community as a whole.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by silent1014376

My first idea I can't take credit for and that is because one of my co's by the name of bladefist suggested it. That idea would be the ability to add a new player in place of one who bails during a war. As examples I have had numerous new members quit after being added into a war. With the ability to replace them in that war it would balance out clan wars. My second idea I might just post on the forums tho and that is a player black list. Basically here's the thought , got a few idiots who hopped quit during war , maybe didn't attack? Add them to the black list for all clans to see. Match it up with a recruit you found and you may have crossed paths with someone else's troublemaker. Ofcourse it would require using player I.d. numbers but I think it could help the entire clash community as a whole.

---

1. Could be helplessly abused. Make a bunch of TH3s, put 10 in war, have them all bail and replace with max TH10s.
2. No. SC isn't putting negative stats.

1. This has been suggested before... it's very exploitable. For example, I start a war with a bunch of TH6, kick them, and add some max TH10s. Hello perfect war.
2. Also been suggested before (I'm starting to see a pattern). It also could be exploited by trolls super easily...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by silent1014376

My first idea I can't take credit for and that is because one of my co's by the name of bladefist suggested it. That idea would be the ability to add a new player in place of one who bails during a war. As examples I have had numerous new members quit after being added into a war. With the ability to replace them in that war it would balance out clan wars. My second idea I might just post on the forums tho and that is a player black list. Basically here's the thought , got a few idiots who hopped quit during war , maybe didn't attack? Add them to the black list for all clans to see. Match it up with a recruit you found and you may have crossed paths with someone else's troublemaker. Ofcourse it would require using player I.d. numbers but I think it could help the entire clash community as a whole.

---

1. This would not be fair! You must be careful who you include in Clan War. Create a circle of trusted players, create your own strategies and clash on. It wouldn't be fair for the stable clans who act like a real team- this is the whole thing about. If your players are hoppers, this is a result from the leader's and Co leaders' work-they didn't do their job well. If you have unstable players in your clan, this is your problem, don't put it over the other clans so that theysuffer because of some leader who doesn't have leadership abilities..
2. This is a good idea to which I suggest one more thing - every leader has the option to block people so they cannot join back to the clan neither send invitations for joining back. I suggest that because some trouble makers join back to my clan and they are accepted by my elder players who don't know the whole history of my clan and that there were players in the past who were arrogant.
Every player has an ID so it is possible to block someone even if that player has edited his name.