Spell Bomb

How about a spell bomb and you can chose which spell is in, is 2x2 like giant bomb and only goes off in this radius, but has a max 3x3 once upgraded (Stays hidden like all other traps).

You can then choose from poison spell with same damage as current, freeze which deals no damage but freezes for an increasing amount of time as you level up and last option a lightning spell.

This can then be set for either ground or air defence only (not both) like a skeleton.

1 at th9 and last and final at th10

(I would only be in favour if SC tweeked current troop health)

Any feedback appreciated ��

Having 2 Poison Spells on the defending team would make 3-starring TH10s even more difficult than it is now.

This is not needed, sorry. Unless the spells could be tweaked to not be as powerful when used with the spell bomb, I'm not a fan of having my troops poisoned and weakened to the point where getting 3-stars will be very difficult.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheScavenger350

Having 2 Poison Spells on the defending team would make 3-starring TH10s even more difficult than it is now.

This is not needed, sorry. Unless the spells could be tweaked to not be as powerful when used with the spell bomb, I'm not a fan of having my troops poisoned and weakened to the point where getting 3-stars will be very difficult.

---

My theory was as the poison takes a while to build up troops may have already left the affected area, but that may need changing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lee1886

My theory was as the poison takes a while to build up troops may have already left the affected area, but that may need changing.

---

As an idea I like it. Maybe we should remove one giant bomb and place the spell bomb. No need to have poison with it cause it does similar to the original giant bomb but you could place a slow down spell. The bomb would not do any damage but it would slow down the attacking troops as long as they stay in its radius. That would be cool.

Given that this would heavily nerf tanks I see no reason to implement this. Sorry!