Glad to know that you see potential in this idea
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Reddigulous
Fair enough. I did miss that in the original post. I will say that makes the idea a bit more intriguing.
However, I don't think you should be able to get loot from it. What is being proposed is offering a potential 50 bases to loot without having to pay the search cost. That allows people to loot while keeping a shield. Again, I don't think the game should allow anything that removes risk from the game.
Now to address your concern...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
deepakkapoor23
You can do war attacks today without losing shield and still get some loot, not the war win loot but loot from attacks.
Sure, take 1000 gold for each war base I hit. Take 5000! No problems with that. Fair enough?
This is a good point.
The war win loot doesn't cover the army costs (elixir/DE). However you get more of other resources so it'd be abusable to get war win loot. So even I am against getting the war win loot.
You could get the normal loot you'd get from attacking the war base which is measly and therefore it'd not be a big deal even if we got absolutely no loot either. You'd have to expend an expensive army to attack a base so I'd say the payment is quite fitting (you get to attack a base and expend resources getting nothing but experience and (maybe) skill in return).
How's that sound?
enable attacks on old war maps
If it makes people too uncomfortable to allow attacks on active war map, at least allow attacks on all old war maps.
Details of last two wars are already available in war log, just need to enable attacking.