WAR: Clan Leadership Absolute Ruling (PLEASE READ and SUPPORT)

I suppose that as a leader, we could have an advanced attack assignment option for all the members in the clan war. Like I can limit who can attack who based on their troop strength and the moment I would let them use an attack for loot if they could.

The problem I had with some of my members, they don't care if they attack a strong base, as long as they get a star and get the bonus loot or they wreck a higher rank in the opposing clan(which i'm really proud of), but ruins the balance of the attack underneath/above them.

In my opinion, my orders aren't absolute because when I say don't, they still do it.
What I want to say is, As a leader I should be able to set a certain range of where my members can attack in war.
Some of my members are strong enough to destroy higher level players (Example: rank 18 TH7 destroys rank 12 Th8 Base) I actually am proud but it ruins the balance of Attacks in the ladder.

For example:
We have 25 members in war,
Allies, In Rank 14-20, TH7 Members High to Low
Opponent, In Rank 16 -23, TH7 Members High to Low

I was hoping that there will be an option to set a more accurate attack assignment on a certain rank in which I allowed them to as Clan Leader.
Something I can put as Ranks 12-25 can only start an attack against rank 14-25.
To avoid them wasting a very valuable attack and to let them know that a war win is better than one's selfish desires.

I'm a filipino, i'm sorry for my english.

I know a lot of players wouldn't support this Idea because a lot of clan members look at the loot before the strength of their desired opponent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gozzi29

I suppose that as a leader, we could have an advanced attack assignment option for all the members in the clan war. Like I can limit who can attack who based on their troop strength and the moment I would let them use an attack for loot if they could.

The problem I had with some of my members, they don't care if they attack a strong base, as long as they get a star and get the bonus loot or they wreck a higher rank in the opposing clan(which i'm really proud of), but ruins the balance of the attack underneath/above them.

In my opinion, my orders aren't absolute because when I say don't, they still do it.
What I want to say is, As a leader I should be able to set a certain range of where my members can attack in war.
Some of my members are strong enough to destroy higher level players (Example: rank 18 TH7 destroys rank 12 Th8 Base) I actually am proud but it ruins the balance of Attacks in the ladder.

For example:
We have 25 members in war,
Allies, In Rank 14-20, TH7 Members High to Low
Opponent, In Rank 16 -23, TH7 Members High to Low

I was hoping that there will be an option to set a more accurate attack assignment on a certain rank in which I allowed them to as Clan Leader.
Something I can put as Ranks 12-25 can only start an attack against rank 14-25.
To avoid them wasting a very valuable attack and to let them know that a war win is better than one's selfish desires.

I'm a filipino, i'm sorry for my english.

---

We don,t really need that we should just get our members of the in line listing to you orders if they don't honestly kick them and I am only saying this because of experience

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Temur

We don,t really need that we should just get our members of the in line listing to you orders if they don't honestly kick them and I am only saying this because of experience

---

You're wrong, all the Leaders feel the same way. this is to avoid players from finding another clan, this is to promote discipline, and war balancing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gozzi29

You're wrong, all the Leaders feel the same way. this is to avoid players from finding another clan, this is to promote discipline, and war balancing.

---

the only thing is that people might leave just because they have to do that anyways so it will not make a difference

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Temur

the only thing is that people might leave just because they have to do that anyways so it will not make a difference

---

My responsibility as a Leader is to lead them to victory, if they don't get it well, i'm gonna teach and help them. if they want to turn their backs on me, then so be it. That's how a leader should be anyway.

If a member of my clan attacks for loot, instead of trying to three-star a lower base, contrary to instructions, I kick them. That's all that is needed, for the clan to know the rules. With a clear strategy and rule, the clan members advise each other.

Don't be a weak leader. Defiance of the leader is unacceptable. If you allow defiance, you are not a leader.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by George1971

If a member of my clan attacks for loot, instead of trying to three-star a lower base, contrary to instructions, I kick them. That's all that is needed, for the clan to know the rules. With a clear strategy and rule, the clan members advise each other.

Don't be a weak leader. Defiance of the leader is unacceptable. If you allow defiance, you are not a leader.

---

I figured players are gonna say that, "kick them out of the clan", but you see, i'm looking at a different perspective that if members don't like how it goes, then they can leave freely afterwards because somehow I see the kick button as a lil bit offensive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gozzi29

I figured players are gonna say that, "kick them out of the clan", but you see, i'm looking at a different perspective that if members don't like how it goes, then they can leave freely afterwards because somehow I see the kick button as a lil bit offensive.

---

Ya know what I find offensive? When a new player comes in my clan that I have built over the past year and then attacks for loot. Is kicking offensive? Sure. At that point, i want to offend them... Don't disrespect me and my loyal clan members and I won't kick you. Simple as that.

I think the only way to successful cw is to slowly add new Members, be patient and give them advice, and with repeating selfish behaviour kick them out...
Need lot's of patience an work, but then you get a clan with no selfish people at all, and that's real fun

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gozzi29

You're wrong, all the Leaders feel the same way. this is to avoid players from finding another clan, this is to promote discipline, and war balancing.

---

I'm a leader and I don't feel this way at all. I would like features added that help clans coordinate in war so it doesn't have to be done in chat/clan mail or a third party app, but I rarely have a problem with members attacking bases they shouldn't be attacking, and if I do, it's as much my fault for lack of communication as it is theirs.

Giving leaders the ability to assign a suggested base or bases, and players the ability to tag a base they are preparing to attack would be helpful. But I do not think it would be a good idea to prevent other players from attacking that base once it is assigned/tagged, or to force players to attack a certain base or range, and I don't see Supercell ever implementing such a feature. First it would be too complicated to code, and second it puts added pressure/responsibility on leaders, and could easily do at least as much harm as good. What if you have a rogue co that decides to screw over the clan? What if players don't show or a leader forgets to reassign bases toward the end of the war?



This really boils down to a clan management issue though...if a player is going to disregard and disrespect your clan's guidelines for attacking in war, I don't know why you'd want to keep them in your clan or let them in your wars, or why you think they'd stay if you're going to force rules on them they have no intention of obeying.

The words "Facism" and "Tyranny" come to mind.

Sounds like you need to be a stronger leader, and consider getting tough with your clan and maybe recruiting some different members. Now, I'm not one to shy away from a good ol' dictator regime, but this idea would never swing. Like I always say, this is more of a YOU problem and less of a SUPERCELL ​problem.

This is like turning the clan into a prison.

In the clan you should help members improve their skills and their experience. This cannot be done by forcing them to attack the base No. X and Y.......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by awesomness2016

I'm a leader and I don't feel this way at all. I would like features added that help clans coordinate in war so it doesn't have to be done in chat/clan mail or a third party app, but I rarely have a problem with members attacking bases they shouldn't be attacking, and if I do, it's as much my fault for lack of communication as it is theirs.

I have no problem with leaders being able to assign a suggested base or bases, or players being able to tag a base they are preparing to attack. But I do not think it would be a good idea to prevent other players from attacking that base once it is assigned/reserved, or to force players to attack a certain base or range. First it would be too complicated to code, and second it puts added pressure/responsibility on leaders, and could easily do at least as much harm as good. What if you have a rogue co that decides to screw over the clan? What if players don't show or a leader forgets to reassign bases toward the end of the war?



This really boils down to a clan management issue though...if a player is going to disregard and disrespect your clan's guidelines for attacking in war, I don't know why you'd want to keep them in your clan, or why you think they'd stay if you're going to force rules on them they have no intention of obeying.

---

I agree with you.

That is some big stuff you are asking there honestly if they do just the opposite of what asked them to do and the do not even care then yeah you should kick them

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Temur

That is some big stuff you are asking there honestly if they do just the opposite of what asked them to do and the do not even care then yeah you should kick them

---

Perfect solution.

If a player will not follow the leaders instructions, especially after multiple request, it's time to give that player a pink slip and exit interview.


It's your clan, either take charge or let someone else take charge for you.


I don't want everything to be automated. I like the freedom, both the freedom to succeed and the freedom to fail.

If you don't have leadership skills, then look for someone who can step up for you.

If your clanmates don't respect your orders in war, kick 'em!