can walls be upgraded without the use of builder please
Printable View
can walls be upgraded without the use of builder please
I don't really agree with that, here are my reasons:
1. It's not realistic
2. Nobody will have any money in their buildings = No raiding loot
3. It's basically a method to save resources
4. Walls are meant to be upgraded slowly.
1. Yeah, it's not realistic but you buy decorations and traps without builders....is that realistic? No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Erebos29
2. Of course they'll still have loot - they need to save up for things apart from walls too, you know! Say, if they are saving for an X-BOW but someone raids them, then they'll be PLENTLY of loot. In other words, they'll have plenty of loot when not focusing on walls. Furthermore, some walls cost over 1mil so if someone is saving for a wall and has 900K then someone raids 'em, there shall be much loot to raid.
3. A method to save resources? Why would you want to save resources which you WANT to spend? Your point makes no sense.
4. Walls shall still continue to be upgraded slowly; there's a reason why they cost so much.
To put it briefly, i agree that you should be able to upgrade builders without walls. :thumbsup:
My responds:Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximIwanskyj
1. Decorations don't do anything vital and important, no need for builders
2. A method to save resources? Correction it's a method to avoid getting attacked by resource hunters
3. What happens if they are NOT th9 and are NOT saving up for something expensive?
4. They will continue quicker as they can be upgraded instantly every time you hit the cost = Everybody does that = No loot in raiding...
First, the fact that walls can be upgraded immediately without a wait time does not negate the fact that all upgradable structures on your base require a builder hut to do so. Why would you believe that walls would be any different?
Second, if walls could be upgraded without a builder hut this would allow people to dump extra loot into their walls before going offline in order to protect it from being stolen. This would have a negative impact on the overall economy of the game.
No, no, no, NO! It has been this way since the beginning of Clash, for a reason. If this would happen, then the economy would break and there would hardly be any loot. You wouldn't want that, would you? Having to reserve a builder (like I do) is very beneficial and it also increases Supercell's profits as more people will gem the builder's huts. Just keep one on walls and you'll be fine.