2nd Tie-Breaker: Time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kissofdeath

If both sidess get all the stars the win should go to the side thats first to get all the stars

---

As already discussed above, no it shouldn't.

I beleive a tie of 100% should be settled by the team which accomplished the 100% in the least amount of attacks. That is an indicator of the stronger of the 2 clans.

If clan 1 took 90% of their attacks to get to 100% stars/destruction but clan 2 did it with 65% of their attacks... then it would seem that clan 2 is the stronger of the 2.

If a third tie breaker is needed, i did like the idea of total time of attacks. Also another indicator of attack efficiency.

Just my $0.02

so is it still a tie when both do 100% ?

Should go alphabetically by clan name.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jkd

Should go alphabetically by clan name.

---

XD Guessing your clan begins with "A" or a number :smirk:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pcpro

I beleive a tie of 100% should be settled by the team which accomplished the 100% in the least amount of attacks. That is an indicator of the stronger of the 2 clans.

---

I very strongly believe that a tie at 100% should be a tie.

I really cannot understand why people believe that there should always be a winner and loser, no matter how even the teams are.

Personally, I never really saw the need even for a first level tiebreaker, but I can live with that (even though we have had 3 ties since it came in, and lost them all).