It's still possible for low TH wars to end up 100% destruction max stars. In this case (if both clans score perfect), the clan that attacked first should be the winner. What do you guys think? Please don't move this thread, I'm asking for opinions.
Printable View
It's still possible for low TH wars to end up 100% destruction max stars. In this case (if both clans score perfect), the clan that attacked first should be the winner. What do you guys think? Please don't move this thread, I'm asking for opinions.
I vote fastest time 3 star
Highly unlikely that a tie in percentage would occur but maybe the clan that achieved the perfect star count first
Terrible idea...
Just rewards the clan that is one at the beginning of war. Also basically gives a huge advantage to those that gem.
A perfect reason for SC to consider it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeeDemonF430
Terrible idea. CW matchmaking can run for too long, putting some clans at extreme disadvantage. Why is so much "effort" being given to a rare tie?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EverettReef
Agree with all of this
Time of first attack has zero relationship to a clan’s ability or skill. Hardly a measure of any merit.
I love it!
The 3rd tie-breaker should be: the clan with the most trophies at the end of the war
4th: the clan with the highest donation count
5th: ...highest total gems?
Not a good idea.Only supports the stupid saying,you win first if you strike first.2nd tiebreaker should be based on duration.