Printable View
What if when you attacked using Revenge it didn't break your "active shield"..?
Would this encourage the use of the (under-utilized?) Revenge feature?
Would this be a problem? Why?
A possible side feature may be that IF you used this new feature (revenge while you had a shield), your opponent would have the opportunity to get YOU back..? (I lobbed a FUED idea some time back relates to this idea).
Ideas? Suggestions?
Cheers, Doug
Revenge isn't underutilised because it isn't something people don't want to do. It's underutilised because it depends on 3 things, the target not being online and not being shielded and having something that you want.
The higher up you go the more you will see how hard it is to revenge anyone past 2600 especially if they have their TH out.
No doubt.. BUT, you and a great deal of the rest of us rarely squander the time to even look into revenge options BECAUSE of those reasons. However, if you have just been raided and have 11hrs47 left on your shield... Ya might be a little more inclined to take a gander and possibly use the feature a little more.Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207
Additionally the process (efficiency) of viewing bases for revenge needs to be improved.
Revenge seems like a cool option - they did do the whole AngryNeesom52 bit so one presumes that there is some interest in improving the option. ..
The one who attacked you lost his shield when he attacked, why shouldn't you also?
That would be great and useful.
I do agree with you devil, but alot of the time it is so hard to revenge people that the person who attacked you already didn't have a shield. So it is hard to solidly say the person who attacked you "lost" his shield. I haven't been revenge attacked in forever. I am not saying I am for this, I am saying that is not entirely true that they "lost" their shield. Maybe say something like they chose to drop their shield.Quote:
Originally Posted by devil9394
Revenge is a dish best served never in CoC.
It's a moot point whether an attack is via Revenge or Nexting. Either way attacking forfeits any shield which may be present. Otherwise it becomes a way to circumvent losing any shield present when attacking. I'm TH 8 so I have some experience but not a lot. The novelty of Revenge wore off when it become common place for me to often raid bases for 300K+ of loot combined.
Quite simply because revenge is too rarely used as it stands.Quote:
Originally Posted by devil9394
How do you rationalize a magical, village-sized shield in the 1st place?
The real problem is that the cool feature of revenge does not come into play like it should.
+1 this idea. Really anything will help at this point, because revenge essentially doesn't exist. Possibly the most forgotten about and broken feature in the game.
Another strike from Mr.Devil....Quote:
Originally Posted by devil9394
^This. Why shouldn't Revenge attacks break your shield, when you do get trophies and loot from them like any other raid?Quote:
Originally Posted by JKL2207