Troops cost too much

I have all my storages full, but my armies are taking way too much out of my elixir. Troop costs need a decrease.

B a r c h !

use barch, attack in higher leagues where loot bonus will cover troops i.e c2-m1, or only attack bases that will cover your troop cost so dont atk a base with 200k gold and 10k lix

And obstacles are too OP.

He has all his storages full, but he complains about his army eating away at his elx? The logic is strong with this one :facepalm:

If you manage to top up your elx storage, then you make more elx than you spend.

What army composition are you using?

• Barch is the cheapest
• GiBarch is a stronger attack, with a intermediate cost
• If you use wizards/drags when raiding, that is just way too expensive and a bad choice

None of these things changes that troops cost too much.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by advanced1

I have all my storages full, but my armies are taking way too much out of my elixir. Troop costs need a decrease.

---

How are your storages full if troops cost too much? They cost just fine.

Barch is not that cheap either for TH10:
Archer 120x 500 = 60k
Barb 120x 300 = 36k
Total = 96k without spells

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CuteBoboi

Barch is not that cheap either for TH10:
Archer 120x 500 = 60k
Barb 120x 300 = 36k
Total = 96k without spells

---

Cheaper than anything else. But barch is no longer a viable strategy at TH10 due to infernos and the fact that hardly any TH10s are inactive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Echo006

Cheaper than anything else. But barch is no longer a viable strategy at TH10 due to infernos and the fact that hardly any TH10s are inactive.

---

What? I have seen plenty of barching in my life. They target bases where they can get 50% on the outside buildings. This is only useful in high leagues because of the loot bonus