Clan rankings should be based on wars scores not trophies.

Clan rankings is based on trophies of the players in the clan.
I think if rankings would be based on scores that gained by clan ,rankings would be more fair and players will be more interested in clan wars.

If SC added this it would take the reason out of trophy pushing the top clans wouldnt be in the top anymore.

I think there should be two so we have both clans that war and ones that push.

the problem with this is trophy pushing is fair and anyone can get to #1 in a matter of a day

the problem with a war leaderboard is only old clans will be at the top and an all town hall 3 clan could have better scores than an all town hall 10 clan, and some clans do not like wars

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fadaei

Clan rankings is based on trophies of the players in the clan.
I think if rankings would be based on scores that gained by clan ,rankings would be more fair and players will be more interested in clan wars.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xTheProx

If SC added this it would take the reason out of trophy pushing the top clans wouldnt be in the top anymore.

---

It's fair that clans like arab champions that are 1st wouldn't be at top any more and clans that are trying in wars reach prize of their try.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BluBest

I think there should be two so we have both clans that war and ones that push.

---

Yeah if there would be both rankings we all get what we want

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BluBest

I think there should be two so we have both clans that war and ones that push.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarkElixirDrill

the problem with this is trophy pushing is fair and anyone can get to #1 in a matter of a day

the problem with a war leaderboard is only old clans will be at the top and an all town hall 3 clan could have better scores than an all town hall 10 clan, and some clans do not like wars

---

Getting to #1 is possible but very hard and not for all who is trying.
About the other thing you said any way by the rankings it is now or what I suggested the new ones can't reach the top easy but they can try.and another way is that rankings be based on scores and numbers of wars they done.I mean average score.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fadaei

Yeah if there would be both rankings we all get what we want

---

War rankings wouldn't work. First of all older clans have the advantage. Secondly war isn't as good of a skill indicator as throphy pushing. What about all the clans with th7s and th8s with a lot wins. All it takes to 3 star a th8 is spamming drags on one side.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Const

War rankings wouldn't work. First of all older clans have the advantage. Secondly war isn't as good of a skill indicator as throphy pushing. What about all the clans with th7s and th8s with a lot wins. All it takes to 3 star a th8 is spamming drags on one side.

---

I said any way older clans would be more successful but clan wars is an interesting part of the game and many try for it.
For ex my clan leader and coleader are so powerful but for getting loot easy they decrease their trophies and concentrate on clan wars.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fadaei

I said any way older clans would be more successful but clan wars is an interesting part of the game and many try for it.
For ex my clan leader and coleader are so powerful but for getting loot easy they decrease their trophies and concentrate on clan wars.

---

Not every powerful village deserve to be on the leader board. Wars are a fun part of the game but it can be fooled easily with trickery like th8.5/9.5. Throphy pushing takes real dedication on the other haND.