Printable View
Hello Forum People/Supercell:
I just came up with this idea because it is convenient. See, you can unlock the Golem at Town Hall 8, and the max level for the Clan Castle at that level is 4. You also unlock P.E.K.K.A.S at Town Hall 8 and yet they only take 25 housing space while the Golem takes 30 space. So if you can unlock the Golem at Town Hall 8, and you unlock P.E.K.K.A.S a well, then you should be able to hold both in the clan castle (not at the same time though).
Thank You,
Goempel
Unfortunately, I don't think this would be very good for high levels, as they could fit many more golems without having to sacrifice too many wizards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Goempel
I'm only viewing this from a Town Hall 8 perspective lol, I didn't think about the higher Town Halls.Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewchang
And it's only a 5 space difference.
That's one extra golem you can fit, which is already a big boost. So I dunno.Quote:
Originally Posted by Goempel
30 Spaces is enough. Golems are extremely powerful troops, and if you know how to use them right, can shield your troops perfectly.
Lowering the Space to 25 would affect Higher level gameplay too much, where Golems are one of the most commonly used troops. People could afford to bring 8 Golems + an additional 10 Wizards to an attack (plus a CC Golem and Wizard to make 9 Golems and 11 Wizards)
9 Golems with 11 Wizards as a potential attack at TH10 would cause the chances to 3-star a max TH10 to skyrocket.
So, I wouldn't want TH10s 3-starring me when I eventually push Trophies at the end of TH10, and I'm sure nobody would.
This is a perfect example of how replies SHOULD be. Thank you Scavenger, thank you.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScavenger350
Don't understand what you are getting at by this. No clan castle can hold more than one golem.Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewchang
Sorry, but when you post a thread on an idea, you're signing up for criticism. Instead of taking it badly, try to use it for your own benefit. Also, please don't flame.
I personally disagree with this idea completely. As a TH8, I don't think you know enough about golems to understand their full potential. In short, they're incredibly good as it is (8,700 total HP at max level!). There's no need to give them a buff as big as this.
When someone posts an idea he/she should expect there can be people who will disagree and constructive criticism which is respectful and helpful is perfectly fine. However he/she did not sign up for any personal attacks or rudeness which definitely was the case in this thread however such posts have been removed. Criticism in the form of rudeness and personal attacks is against forum rules and have no place here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Callywally
Have a look at Scavenger's post earlier in this thread for example. That is a perfect example of constructive criticism and there is nothing wrong with that at all. However the remarks to which the OP was responding to were uncalled for. Constructive criticism explains why something is not such a good idea and is much more likely to be listened to then an attack on a personal level because that has to be the weakest argument by far.
On a personal level I too agree that golems are balanced fine as they are and a housing space reduction for them would make them too powerful.
Back to the topic at hand please.
I guess this is actually unneeded? Normally 5 golems took 150 spaces; but after this update(if SC added into the game) , 6 golems will took 150 spaces too. That is too OP.
Golem has the highest HP of all ground units, decreasing its housing space will make it more OP. Imagine you are the defender, would you actually like to see 6 maxed golems (with lesser spc) and mass wizards ruining your base?
And finally, a max pekka in a TH8's cc is actually OP, imagine a golem in it!
Hmmm interesting but it would change the entire game for high trophy players. The mass golem attack is already OP. Why would we want to make it stronger :/
This also prevents TH8 from receiving max golems as donations. That would change the gowipe at TH8 substantially.
Agreed: no more said lolQuote:
Originally Posted by M4rkMellow
I think this thread served its purpose now.
I'd like to thank those who managed to keep it constructive.
Since the sarcasm and less constructive posts continued its time to wrap it up.