New Dark Spell - The Wrath Spell

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sujalthelost

Basically, at the moment, defenses of TH10 are very strong. It impossible to 3* a good TH10 even with max troops. So this spell would balance the game. Defenses would need to be spreaded, which would be another challenge, and using the SPELL would also be a challenge, for mastering it.

---

Even max town hall 10s can be three starred, it's just difficult. I don't have a problem with it being very hard to three star a decent town hall 10, for otherwise it would detract from the required gameplay to obtain the skill to do so. If any town hall 10 can three star any other town hall 10, where's the competition? Where's the necessity for experience? I feel this spell would too greatly change the gameplay without improving it at all. It's not fair for an already overpowered attack such as GoWiPe to become even more OP with a spell like this. Wizards destroying buildings more easily, yet sustaining less damage in return? Doesn't seem very fair, especially with a housing space of only one. I could bring along four of these spells in place of two freeze spells!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willdabeast01123

Even max town hall 10s can be three starred, it's just difficult. I don't have a problem with it being very hard to three star a decent town hall 10, for otherwise it would detract from the required gameplay to obtain the skill to do so. If any town hall 10 can three star any other town hall 10, where's the competition? Where's the necessity for experience? I feel this spell would too greatly change the gameplay without improving it at all. It's not fair for an already overpowered attack such as GoWiPe to become even more OP with a spell like this. Wizards destroying buildings more easily, yet sustaining less damage in return? Doesn't seem very fair, especially with a housing space of only one. I could bring along four of these spells in place of two freeze spells!

---

A decent TH10 doesn't get 3*. It's impossible. This spell would be very useful against max TH10. Though it would be a but OP at low TH10s but it can be resisted by increasing its cost and more other changes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sujalthelost

A decent TH10 doesn't get 3*. It's impossible. This spell would be very useful against max TH10. Though it would be a but OP at low TH10s but it can be resisted by increasing its cost and more other changes

---

If you watch Chief Pat on YouTube, he discusses the possibility of three starring maxed bases with different army comps. He himself doesn't generally show maxed bases being three starred, but talks about it as being possible. I believe his clan mates may do so from time to time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willdabeast01123

If you watch Chief Pat on YouTube, he discusses the possibility of three starring maxed bases with different army comps. He himself doesn't generally show maxed bases being three starred, but talks about it as being possible. I believe his clan mates may do so from time to time.

---

There's no proof so far, and even if 10 people can do that, doesn't mean all can

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sujalthelost

There's no proof so far, and even if 10 people can do that, doesn't mean all can

---

Pointless dialogue. Most people don't have max bases anyways. For the average player, this just makes an OP attack even more OP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willdabeast01123

Pointless dialogue. Most people don't have max bases anyways. For the average player, this just makes an OP attack even more OP.

---

But if you read whole thread, you check it's stats, you will see it not OP. I don't think it's OP

But I think that if you say it's OP it maybe. Could you please state what makes this OP so I could fix that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sujalthelost

But if you read whole thread, you check it's stats, you will see it not OP. I don't think it's OP

But I think that if you say it's OP it maybe. Could you please state what makes this OP so I could fix that

---

There's no particular stat that makes it OP, it's the concept. A max wizard sustaining 30% less damage from all defenses, while dealing 30% more damage? It's a glorified heal and rage spell (heal in the sense that it prevents damage). I could take four or five of these things, and just tank until I reach the town hall. Golems already have more than enough hitpoints, but now you're making all defenses 30% less effective against them for 12 seconds? If I take five of them, that's a full minute with 30% less damage, and wizards dealing 30% more damage. This would lead to more maxed bases getting three starred, and that would still require a good amount of skill, but for the average defense, this could be used horribly in GoWiPe and still be extremely effective. Lavaloon and hog attacks, which center around destroying defenses first, would become even more OP than they currently are. I could spam the base with these spells until I knock out ad. The cost and such I don't object to. I would say the only way to fix it would be to decrease the percentage, but that's essentially just nerfing it and everyone will just opt for heal, rage, or freeze.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willdabeast01123

There's no particular stat that makes it OP, it's the concept. A max wizard sustaining 30% less damage from all defenses, while dealing 30% more damage? It's a glorified heal and rage spell (heal in the sense that it prevents damage). I could take four or five of these things, and just tank until I reach the town hall. Golems already have more than enough hitpoints, but now you're making all defenses 30% less effective against them for 12 seconds? If I take five of them, that's a full minute with 30% less damage, and wizards dealing 30% more damage. This would lead to more maxed bases getting three starred, and that would still require a good amount of skill, but for the average defense, this could be used horribly in GoWiPe and still be extremely effective. Lavaloon and hog attacks, which center around destroying defenses first, would become even more OP than they currently are. I could spam the base with these spells until I knock out ad. The cost and such I don't object to. I would say the only way to fix it would be to decrease the percentage, but that's essentially just nerfing it and everyone will just opt for heal, rage, or freeze.

---

So what do you think should I do? Yes, decreasing it would nerf that and people would use heal, rage and freeze. Maybe I should lower damage on troops stat?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sujalthelost

So what do you think should I do? Yes, decreasing it would nerf that and people would use heal, rage and freeze. Maybe I should lower damage on troops stat?

---

That could help. It would reduce the problem of making golems far too tanky. Then it becomes a percentage based rage spell primarily, which isn't a bad thing. It's similar to how the earthquake was a percentage based lightning spell. The appeal of that, however, is its effect on walls. I would suggest incorporating some special ability or such that makes it desirable over just a rage spell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by willdabeast01123

That could help. It would reduce the problem of making golems far too tanky. Then it becomes a percentage based rage spell primarily, which isn't a bad thing. It's similar to how the earthquake was a percentage based lightning spell. The appeal of that, however, is its effect on walls. I would suggest incorporating some special ability or such that makes it desirable over just a rage spell.

---

Speciality - effect on defenses and also makes them cause less damage