Printable View
Why people use that queen healer(superqueen or whatever) strategy when GiBarch(example) is much better to use for farming gold and elixir but also for DE?
GiBarch: faster training and it's safer to use
Superqueen: your queen in 95% cases stays at full health, but there is risk you will take nothing(queen loves to go around base)
Considering the amount of complaints I saw about this strategy with healers+queen, and the suggestions posted in IFr to nerf this combo.. I'd say it is pretty effective for those who know how to control their queen.
its just for fun, breaks up the monotony of the barch
You can 2 star any th9 whit it, thats probably the reason.
The only thing the player has to do is proper funneling
use 4 EQ to the center and you are golden
I found gibarch to be very effective in the crystal league but when I went up to masters and then champs I needed something more. Gowipes and Gowiwi work but are extremely slow and expensive. Then I started running super queen....Nearly unstoppable by a th9, gets to DE and TH every time. All you have to do is create a simple funnel with minions, which is very easy. This tactic can garner around 50k DE per gem boost set. I also just adopted the similar QuennWalk strategy for war which is AWESOME! In addition many Clashers don't need gold or elixir nearly as much as we need the DE. The only thing I am spending gold and elixir on is walls....but my AQ is thirsty always and demands more to drink. Have a good one, Clash On!Quote:
Originally Posted by ExcaliburBL1221
Technically speaking in most cases, if done correctly by familiar raiders, SuperQueen/HeMi etc doesn't exactly train THAT much slower than GiBArch.
Depending on where you're farming, a L15+ AQ really only requires ~6-8 healers per raid as well as maybe ~6 wbs and ~8-12 minions and a lot of the time, no spells besides maybe a poison and in the odd case, a jump.
My general army comp is 12 healers, 10 wbs, 16 minions. If I come across a worthwhile TH8, I'll likely need 7 healers, 6 wbs and 10 minions. Post-raid, I'll have 5 healers left, plus the 4 that finished in the search/raid time (1 per barracks) and then minions/wbs take no time to replenish. I could theoretically raid immediately. Unboosted, you couldn't necessarily do that with GiBArch. Given that immediate 2nd raid using all my healers, there would be some time between raids following it, but it would really be for 1 full round of healers to finish (15 minutes) as I'm sure another 1 from each barracks would finish or be very close to finished after search/raid time. Since spells really aren't required, that's a lot of made up time on raids due to GiBArch often times requiring them.
As for safer, I can't even begin to explain how much safer SuperQueen is. It's become automatic and far easier against even the best maxed TH9s. I feel zero threat when using SuperQueen. GiBArch is susceptible to unlurable CCs and traps - especially GBs. Unfortunate timing can wipe out a mass amount of your push. CC loons can take out your giants in a heartbeat.
I find SuperQueen to be the most efficient and safest form of raiding - specifically for DE in Masters.
Yup, have agree with this.Quote:
Originally Posted by immortalzrizing
I had no intention of maxing my Healer until i heard about Super Queen strategy. I just started my healer upgrade just so I can test this combination out myself.
Because qhealer is an automatic 2star when you know what you're doing. Gibarch sometimes falls short.
plus your queen is fully healthy and ready to go for the next attack if you do it right