Printable View
We get alot of 99% or 95%+ attacks in my clan that it's begging to get really annoying.
i suggest that from 95+ % we get 3 stars.
Did i do a whole attack and get 99% to lose a star for only 1% !?
Please consider how annoying it is and thanks.
PS:i hope nothing is against rules in my post and sorry if there was.
Sorry, so what exactly is your idea? To make it less annoying? :smirk: #SpamQuote:
Originally Posted by TiToTiTo
Why? It meana you haven't been trying enough. Losing by 1% doesnt mean its because of the game, it because of your skill and timing and strategizing.
No this is not written in the stickies as ruled out but I don't see the reason why this should be added. The 3 stars represent a perfect attack, and a 100% should be the only one to give that. If you failed to do a perfect attack, I don't see why you should be rewarded with a star.
If it would be to make the 95% the 3rd star, people would then ask for 94% and 93% "because they are too close".. no, 100% shall stay the same and should make the difference between a perfect attack and a failed one.
You still want 3 stars even though you failed?
It's not kindergarden, there is no 'oh you tried you get 1st prize' action here.
Get 100% or no 3 stars. Simple.
If you didn't get a perfect attack, then you shouldn't be rewarded 3 stars. Just get 100% and you'll get 3 stars.
Hmm..this is actually not at stickies and not ruled out.By the way, 3 stars are rewarded for a perfect attack,that means 100%. The problem of you is just bad at timing...
What next - I want three stars just for trying?
I feel your pain - really I do. But 3 stars is for perfect attacks and perfect means 100%. Not 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999% or anything lower.
ok guyz thanks for replying,
i just mean if I'm tested to defeat a base and i defeated it but didn't have time for one builder hut doesn't mean i lose, i beat that base but was (unlucky) for missing 1 builder hut by seconds.
my clan agreed with me that's why i posted here, But offcource if the mainstream is against it then it's not good,
Thanks all for your time.
Offcource i agree if 3rd star is considered for (perfect) win not just win then it's 100%
A perfect attack is all about planning every move, including the clean-up troops. If the base has buildings in the corners, save 2-3 spare troops to deploy specifically for those corners so that the troops from inside the base won't have to circle the entire map.Quote:
Originally Posted by TiToTiTo
Running out of time? increase time in war attacks maybe to 5 min. so if there is 1 archer left u cant 3 star.Quote:
Originally Posted by KeenWarrior
I don't think they should give you a 3rd star for 99%, but maybe supercell can mail you a participation ribbon that says "good try" that you can hang on your fridge?
/sarcasm
I don't think so. The people are still discussing wether you should get two stars if you take out everything but the TH. Idon't think its going to happen. So its most defiantly not going to happen with three starring. Sorry mate.
3 stars means you won. Not almost won.Quote:
Originally Posted by TiToTiTo
Also, you use this update, then what happens?
The people complain saying that they got 94% and only 2 stars...
Also, annoying in wars.
Should stay at 100% for 3.
Maybe they should make 1/2 stars:). That could also eliminate ties.
Better than 99% 1 star with the TH being the last building remaining.
Your attack strategy failed, their base design was good.
Shouldn't reward the first and punish the latter....
Yes agree, i do that myselfQuote:
Originally Posted by devil9394
There have been threads created discussing possibly adding a fourth star: 1 for 50% 2 for 75%, 1 for TH, and all 4 for perfect. This would distinguish between a not very good attack, an OK attack, a pretty good attack, and a perfect attack. It would definitely make some more variation in high-level clan wars. I doubt SC would ever add a fourth star, though. 3 stars have been in the game since the beginning. :unsure: