Printable View
i dont know if someone has already wrote about this but i think this will solve clan war ties.
So basically all the percenages from war attacks will be added together and which clan got more percentages of enemy villages they will win the war. Sounds so simple and i cannot think any reason why supercell hasnīt already done this to prevent those stupid ties.
Want to prevent a tie? Try putting up three stars. Max out your offensive firepower before you max your base defensively.
You'd still have ties when the war ends 30/30. Unless you mean ALL attacks, even the ones that don't count, in which case, that's a terrible idea.
why not compute which team has the highest % of base destruction, not from ALL attacks (or a 99% 2* followed by a 3* almost counts for 2 3*, but just highest % of base destruction with best attacks? Then they'd have the win.
war ends 30/30 and then the game checks which team got more percentages of enemy bases combined and the one with more percantages taken from enemy bases wins, simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dresden
i am max th10 with lvl 10 walls and 35+ heroes :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Argat
Sounds simple enough and if SC hasn't implemented this or some variation of it- it's because it would benefit smarter, stronger clans over weaker ones. The way I see it- every update or change that SC makes to the game is done so with the mindset of helping the bad or weaker player. This would be no different.Quote:
Originally Posted by xVety97
Even max th10'?????Quote:
Originally Posted by Argat
Why do they need "solving"?Quote:
Originally Posted by xVety97
Why would they want to prevent them?Quote:
So basically all the percenages from war attacks will be added together and which clan got more percentages of enemy villages they will win the war. Sounds so simple and i cannot think any reason why supercell hasnīt already done this to prevent those stupid ties.
I can't think of any reason why they would bother to do something which would add nothing to the game.
I suspect you may be from the USA - nowhere else in the world understands the fixation in that nation with every match being played until you get a result. In most sports, in other parts of the world, there can be ties in any competition whcih is not a knockout format.
In a average th10 clan all the bases get easily 2 starred but almost never 3 starred so there are clans what get ties all the time cause both clans are good but not that good to get 3 stars, you clearly havent been in good th10 clans if you dont see the problem. And that tie prevents clans getting that bonus 50xp from win, and then neither of them gets the bonus which is a lot.
This is so simple. Why was this never thought of before?
Sorry to be a party pooper, but maybe the thread would get more noticed here.
Nationality has nothing to do with your ideas about Clash of Clans. I suspect you may be extremely unintelligent or else just incredibly ignorant - nobody else could assume they are right when making such an opinionated statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by alexheney
I know ties happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by xVety97
I don't understand why you believe it to be a "problem" that needs "fixing".
It does.Quote:
And that tie prevents clans getting that bonus 50xp from win, and then neither of them gets the bonus which is a lot.
Just as in most Football (soccer) leagues nowadays, you get 3 points for a win, but only 1 each for a draw (tie).
And many other sports have similar rules, where the points on offer for a win are more than the sum of points all teams get for a draw.
I know ties occur. I don't see why they should be prevented.
Now I don't know about other sports that are popular outside of the US, but football/soccer, the most popular international sport, has a tiebreaker system. So yeah, you're done.Quote:
Originally Posted by alexheney
I am neither unintelligent nor ignorant.Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamCoC99
And unlike you, have not made any post in which I "assume I'm right", never mind while making an opinionated statemnt.
Maybe i should post it there?Quote:
Originally Posted by Echo006
Quote:
Originally Posted by xVety97
The main problem here is it conflicts with other strategies designed to help clans win...
For example...on offense, sometimes we have an enemy TH10 that it will be a ♥♥♥♥ shoot for our TH10s to get 2 stars, and in attempting to do so they could easily get 1 or 0, so instead we send a TH9 to get 50%, saving our TH10 attacks for lower bases that our TH9s may not be able to 3 star.
On defense, the problem is even more pronounced...some of the best base designs allow attackers to get 70 or 80% but protect the TH very well, and may require multiple attacks to get more than 1 star. Now if this is successful chances are you win, but if you end up tying, what used to be considered a good base design is now causing you to lose.
Of course it does.Quote:
Originally Posted by charizzle
Perhaps you didn't read the bit where I said "in any competition which is not a knockout format"?
Yes, soccer has extra time followed by a penalty shootout - used only in knockout competitions where the winner goes on to the next round and the loser is out. In that format of competition, a tie obviously has to be resolved somehow.
But in league competitions, ties are always allowed - although even there, in the USA this has not always been true. Major League Soccer has only allowed ties for the last 15 years.
more opinions from people???
Its against the rules to bump your own thread....
In any case - I do not like using any of the 3 stats available to break ties. It inhibits clans from being able to go for loot if they think they can win the war.
% destruction? What is the bottom of the clan supposed to do in a war like we had a few ago? We had a TH5 at the bottom, their bottom was a TH8. We had a few TH7s. The war was close anyway and we almost pulled off a tie. But clearly our bottom would have hurt any chance we had of getting that tie.
New stars per attack? Again, prevents people from trying to get loot when they have zero chance of getting a star. Imagine that same TH5 against anyone above. No shot at a star that matters. But just maybe they could get 50% to get some loot. We would restrict anyone from doing 2nd attacks unless we knew the war was won.
Certainly not ave attack duration. What does that really mean? I would think this is a stat that lower would be better. But someone clicking in and dropping 1 troop to offset the average would be gaming the system.
*IF* Super Cell wants to change ties (why should they really) - they need a new mechanism to do so.
bumped cause i got movedQuote:
Originally Posted by gamul1
I dont really see an issue with this, if they would implement this and there was a tie in the end of a war the game would just calculate "overall base destruction" or something like that. There would just be alot of percents in a 50vs50 war. Example: "overall base destruction clan1 vs clan2: 4885% / 4887%" (50v50)