Idea: Leave/kicked from war penalty

How many times have you had someone in war that flagrantly blew their attacks, didn't follow a clans strategy or deliberating did something just to get the loot then leaves in hopes that your clan wins.

Well, it would be nice if a user left or were kicked before war ends if they were penalized. Maybe they only get a similar percentage to if the clan lost the war. And if they did lose, an even smaller percentage. This would give more incentive to finishing a war, rather then sabotaging a war for your own benefit, or clan hopping between wars. If your not there when the war ends, your loot winnings are penalized.

We like to give new people a shot in our wars, maybe they become regulars and stay in the clan. Or maybe they won't, but at least it gives the clan some control over whether the person(s) reap the benefits or not of a clans winnings.

Oh, and I know others have suggested penalty ideas about not leaving, or not being able to join another clan.

But I haven't seen any thing about penalizing their loot winnings. They want to leave, they can leave. They just don't get their full winnings is what I'm saying. Same if they are kicked.

I don't let anyone in a war til they have been in our clan for one week. This has eliminated that problem.

They do get penalized already actually, they cannot join a war for any other clan until your war ends. In some cases that is up to 48 hours where they are locked out of war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daz258

They do get penalized already actually, they cannot join a war for any other clan until your war ends. In some cases that is up to 48 hours where they are locked out of war.

---

But that's if they leave early in the war. There's nothing we can do about those guys. I'm talking about the ones that wait until war starts then do some stupid attack or attacks. We've even seen people say they want to participate and act like they want to participate, then attack #X because they just want 1 star to get the loot. Then say, 'I'll attack whoever I want'. And either leave or we kick them. Those are the ones in talking about. They leave or get kicked, they don't get the loot they could have had if they had warred as part of the clan instead of as an individual.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Roynice152

I don't let anyone in a war til they have been in our clan for one week. This has eliminated that problem.

---

Yeah, we've tried that to, but I guess we're just to generous and like to give people a chance. :D

Definately not kicking. D-bags would just kick people for fun to penalize them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smotrs

But that's if they leave early in the war. There's nothing we can do about those guys. I'm talking about the ones that wait until war starts then do some stupid attack or attacks. We've even seen people say they want to participate and act like they want to participate, then attack #X because they just want 1 star to get the loot. Then say, 'I'll attack whoever I want'. And either leave or we kick them. Those are the ones in talking about. They leave or get kicked, they don't get the loot they could have had if they had warred as part of the clan instead of as an individual.

---

Gotcha, that is more difficult for SuperCell to have a system to 'punish' them however.

How do you put in a code to differentiate between a genuine mistake and someone just been plain selfish?

I think all you can do there is just let new players know they sit on the sidelines for a full war first before joining one. Those who want to be rouge are unlikely to wait that long for a war.

The best shot is to make them wait a certain period of time before getting into their first war, if they wait let's say 4 days (2 wars), then they are definitely not going to just waste their attacks because nobody will wait 4 days to do that. However, I don't think kicked people should be punished for leaving during war because not all of those who leave did what you described here to the clan.

Yeah, I'm sure there would be jerk clans that would kick just to mess with people, but I believe the majority usually wait until the war is over in most cases, we do. Unless they flagrantly did something stupid, then we'll remove them so they can't screw us over on their 2nd attack somehow. Sure, we waste an attack that way.

And yeah, we do currently have people wait a war or two before they can participate. So we can talk to them, get to know them a little and just get a feeling for whether they are worth it or not. In most cases, it works. But we still end up with some jackholes now and then that deserve to be kicked . :D

Anyway, it was just a thought. Wanted to see what others thought to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smotrs

How many times have you had someone in war that flagrantly blew their attacks, didn't follow a clans strategy or deliberating did something just to get the loot then leaves in hopes that your clan wins.

Well, it would be nice if a user left or were kicked before war ends if they were penalized. Maybe they only get a similar percentage to if the clan lost the war. And if they did lose, an even smaller percentage. This would give more incentive to finishing a war, rather then sabotaging a war for your own benefit, or clan hopping between wars. If your not there when the war ends, your loot winnings are penalized.

We like to give new people a shot in our wars, maybe they become regulars and stay in the clan. Or maybe they won't, but at least it gives the clan some control over whether the person(s) reap the benefits or not of a clans winnings.

---

Never happened to me. My group just doesn't let new guys in wars. Also, if this was implemented, it shouldn't apply to being kicked. You get rid of the guy, it's not his fault.