Do we want a wars won league other leagues unfair?

I really love clash. My clan, wars back to back. 25 of us have stayed together from the start and really work as a team and haven't lost a war in a long time. This is mainly because we go for stars, not war loot. We are about 103 war wins level 6 clan with about 10000 ish trophies.

Now my quarrel is
Clan league is bases on trophies:
your place in this league depends who you let in you clan and how long you have played for not how good your clan players are.(do you really want newbies raking in the rewards that you clan have worked hard for just to up your trophies count). To be able to get anywhere in the game you need to drop trophies then gain then drop etc

Clan level
To begin with I worked really hard to get my clan level up but now started to realise the perks are quite good but again doesn't really show how well you clan is doing.you still get stars for losing so over time you look good.

in someways I think the game is a bit unfair as it doesn't show you how good your clan is in a fair way. I would love to see a wars won league. This would give my guys something to work towards.

A lot of top clans( based on trophies) hadn't really been in many wars only since the clan level was introduced did they really start.

please please please do a wars won league

im not hear to argue I really love the game but would love to know other people's thoughts I may have missed something.

I'm assuming you mean "leaderboad" when you say "league", otherwise I don't really know what you mean (replacing trophy leagues would just be silly).

You're basically just saying multiplayer doesn't matter, wars are what matters. That's a valid opinion, but you can make arguments going the other way too. Personally, I like measuring by multiplayer for a number of reasons.

The biggest issue with a wars leaderboard is that it would be very static. An upstart clan would literally have zero chance of ever making it on there.

Furthermore, the individual players would mean nothing. You could replace every member in the clan and your rank wouldn't change (at least not for awhile).

I'm also quite happy with the current structure of the leaderboard; I think it's perfectly fair, you're just comparing apple to oranges.

Personally, I think Clash is now just as much about clan wars as it is about multiplayer. You generally use multiplayer to build your village and make yourself stronger, clan wars are about joining together to make a successful clan that can compete against others on a long term basis. Judging a clan purely by its members' trophy count seems very biased towards multiplayer and excludes clans that actually manage to stay intact and be successful working as a team.

I don't think there is any suggestion of getting rid of multiplayer trophy leaderboards, merely a suggestion that it's about time clans that succeed as a clan in clan wars (which is surely how clans should be measured) are recognised in a similar way as multiplayer.

Yes sorry leader boards. Most clans seem to break up after a few wars, sticking in the same clan and trying to win every battle for the clan should be recognised. I'm not saying replace other leader boards because I like to see top bases as well, but top clans should be on a board for war win trophies and not multiplayer trophies because that's not really anything to do with the clan as a whole. I do see the point to the game as that you build a strong base and troops using multi player, join a clan that sees you as a good attacker and defender and then you use all that in clan wars. Otherwise what's the point to building up a base with good troops?