War Starring System 50% = 99%

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squall9010

I told you exactly how they were both contradictory and superficial. Your reason for it not to change, your response to why it shouldn't change, was that anything less than 100 is just participation trophies. But you stand by the current system because its established. Connect the dots of what you are saying yourself, I'm not doing it again.

And you clearly do not understand why this thread was made or what it is asking for looking at your responses. Its not about adding an extra star, learn to read.

Pointless speaking to you if you are not going to reply with actual substance to what has been said, instead of asinine straw-man arguments.

---

Umm, OP clearly wants to add not 1 but 2 extra stars. Maybe you should learn to read fella.

And if you do learn to read you will see my main point isnt that the current system is perfect but that none of the proposed "solutions" are any better than the current system so why bother changing? You dont like my opinions because they differ from yours not because they are contradictory.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squall9010

Wow I'm impressed. I was going to reply to that part too but decided not to as i wouldve got an infraction for sure in the process.:p

---

I do a lot of backspacing lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cowbug

Umm, OP clearly wants to add not 1 but 2 extra stars. Maybe you should learn to read fella.

And if you do learn to read you will see my main point isnt that the current system is perfect but that none of the proposed "solutions" are any better than the current system so why bother changing? You dont like my opinions because they differ from yours not because they are contradictory.

---

Yes, I realized 75% should not be worth more than a TH. So I assigned 2 points to the TH to accommodate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cowbug

Change is fine when is serves a purpose. I don't believe a change to the war stars serves a purpose other than to arbitrarily move an already arbitrary number and/or add an arbitrary number of stars.

3 works fine. If using 3 it makes sense to use half, TH and 100% for the star points. If you make your own game and want to use 4 or 5 star system, Im sure it would also work fine but the devs of this game chose 3 and it also works well, I think.

I would rather see SC spend time/resources on fixing and adding to the game. I personally dont feel a change to the war starring system does either.

---

So basically its not bad. And you are not against the idea. Why not say that then? And why not address what I said about th10 wars while you're at it? If you think its not an issue that's fine, but I have told you in what scenario it is an issue and you have yet to say anything about that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FisherPrice

The devs of this game chose a lot of things that have been changed or deleted, not to mention the all new things added.

The devs chose for every member of a clan to go to war, starting top down, based on how many trophies you have. Why arbitrarily change that?

Come to think of it, the devs chose not to even have clan wars in this game.

Saying "the devs chose" as your argument for something pretty much says that you have no reasoning or logic behind your position.

---

Thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squall9010

So basically its not bad. And you are not against the idea. Why not say that then? And why not address what I said about th10 wars while you're at it? If you think its not an issue that's fine, but I have told you in what scenario it is an issue and you have yet to say anything about that.

---

Quote yourself for me and Ill take a look because I don't know what you are talking about and Im not going to sift through 30+ pages to find it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cowbug

Umm, OP clearly wants to add not 1 but 2 extra stars. Maybe you should learn to read fella.

And if you do learn to read you will see my main point isnt that the current system is perfect but that none of the proposed "solutions" are any better than the current system so why bother changing? You dont like my opinions because they differ from yours not because they are contradictory.

---

I meant that the purpose isn't to add a star for the sake of it. That is also the answer to your second paragraph. If you understood why it is being proposed then you would see.

And your opinions are contradictory because they differ from your opinion. Do I need to quote the dictionary for you?

You do not like the proposed system but like are fond of the current system 'because it works' and because its 'established' despite it containing the same 'flaws' you do not like of the proposed system. That is contradictory. It is also superifical because what it amounts to is 'its part of the game' which means nothing in a game that has updates. You are not posting anything of substance. Quite similar to what the pro-zappers used to say really. You don't actually acknowledge the other sides arguments and address them, and instead keep talking in circles bringing up the same straw-man arguments.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FisherPrice

The devs of this game chose a lot of things that have been changed or deleted, not to mention the all new things added.

The devs chose for every member of a clan to go to war, starting top down, based on how many trophies you have. Why arbitrarily change that?

Come to think of it, the devs chose not to even have clan wars in this game.

Saying "the devs chose" as your argument for something pretty much says that you have no reasoning or logic behind your position.

---

I will respond to you with my own unedited statement:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cowbug

Change is fine when is serves a purpose. I don't believe a change to the war stars serves a purpose other than to arbitrarily move an already arbitrary number and/or add an arbitrary number of stars.

3 works fine. If using 3 it makes sense to use half, TH and 100% for the star points. If you make your own game and want to use 4 or 5 star system, Im sure it would also work fine but the devs of this game chose 3 and it also works well, I think.

I would rather see SC spend time/resources on fixing and adding to the game. I personally dont feel a change to the war starring system does either.

---

The devs can choose to change the war star scoring if they choose, BUT I would rather see SC spend time/resources on fixing and adding to the game. I personally dont feel a change to the war starring system does either.

[QUOTE=Squall9010;5101827]I meant that the purpose isn't to add a star for the sake of it. That is also the answer to your second paragraph. If you understood why it is being proposed then you would see.

And your opinions are contradictory because they differ from your opinion. Do I need to quote the dictionary for you?



lol squal I already did that. It's in one of the last few pages. I define contradiction then provide an example of one :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cowbug

Change is fine when is serves a purpose. I don't believe a change to the war stars serves a purpose other than to arbitrarily move an already arbitrary number and/or add an arbitrary number of stars.

3 works fine. If using 3 it makes sense to use half, TH and 100% for the star points. If you make your own game and want to use 4 or 5 star system, Im sure it would also work fine but the devs of this game chose 3 and it also works well, I think.

I would rather see SC spend time/resources on fixing and adding to the game. I personally dont feel a change to the war starring system does either.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squall9010

I meant that the purpose isn't to add a star for the sake of it. That is also the answer to your second paragraph. If you understood why it is being proposed then you would see.

And your opinions are contradictory because they differ from your opinion. Do I need to quote the dictionary for you?

You do not like the proposed system but like are fond of the current system 'because it works' and because its 'established' despite it containing the same 'flaws' you do not like of the proposed system. That is contradictory. It is also superifical because what it amounts to is 'its part of the game' which means nothing in a game that has updates. You are not posting anything of substance. Quite similar to what the pro-zappers used to say really. You don't actually acknowledge the other sides arguments and address them, and instead keep talking in circles bringing up the same straw-man arguments.

---

You dont know how to read do you.

I dont want a change that adds nothing significant to the game. I understand why you amd OP want the change but dont agree that it is necessary, the current system is NOT perfect but it works well and its not flawed enough to change it out for another flawed system.