War Starring System 50% = 99%

The 3* system, I think is a great equalizer for mismatched wars. Someone with lvl 20 heroes and some skill can 2* someone with lvl 40 heroes. Someone with lvl 40 heroes and low skill can only 2* someone with lvl 20 heroes. In fact, the % of the base you take down often corresponds to hero levels--and as little as hero levels seem to matter in matchups, such a proposed system would do more for the matchup determining the victor than any measure of skill.

Just make it 3 stars--33%=1, 67%=2, 100%=3

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LegionOK

The 3* system, I think is a great equalizer for mismatched wars. Someone with lvl 20 heroes and some skill can 2* someone with lvl 40 heroes. Someone with lvl 40 heroes and low skill can only 2* someone with lvl 20 heroes. In fact, the % of the base you take down often corresponds to hero levels--and as little as hero levels seem to matter in matchups, such a proposed system would do more for the matchup determining the victor than any measure of skill.

---

So then how does the current system declare who is the more talented person by awarding both attackers 2 stars?

I like the current system tbh. Bad attackers can still get 2 stars and then you have to throw out a great attack to get 3 stars.

I do not support a 4 star system however I could get behind

1 star for th, 1 star for 65%, and 1 star for 100%. That would make things tougher and maybe thats what people want. Wouldn't effect us much because we typically go for 3 stars on all th9s...and when we are trying to 2 star it seems we end up with more than 65% alot of the time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coachmoneyball

I like the current system tbh. Bad attackers can still get 2 stars and then you have to throw out a great attack to get 3 stars.

I do not support a 4 star system however I could get behind

1 star for th, 1 star for 65%, and 1 star for 100%. That would make things tougher and maybe thats what people want. Wouldn't effect us much because we typically go for 3 stars on all th9s...and when we are trying to 2 star it seems we end up with more than 65% alot of the time.

---

So you're okay with a bad attack being rewarded just as much as a near perfect attack? Do you like rewarding mediocrity or what?

And 65% might ruin TH10 wars.

A poll must be created to submit to SC for further analysis.

It's still stuck in my head! 99% and only one bloody star!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quarks

Pretty much all our wars (that are not bad mismatches) get decided by what happens on the top few bases. Th7,8 and low 9 don't matter, they get 3d anyway. In my experience, seemingly small differences in matchup can already have a big impact. Last war one of my clanmates checked the opponent and said "We have one more TH9, we win..." It was a joke, but it has a lot of truth to it.
Would a 4 star system serve to make those differences smaller or worse? I'm not entirely sure, but my gut feeling is that matchmaking would carry even more weight than it already does.

(And on the topic of my base: I get hit by max gowhatever all the time, nobody has ever 3d my base (since maxed defenses and legos). 3starring strong TH9 is not as easy as some forumers make it out to be for the average player).

---

Just won a war with 2 less TH9s than opponent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thebuch4

Another small tidbit.. After watching another attack shred a base but only had enough room for archers for three of the builders hut and the remaining pack of valks stayed together to overkill one shot every building in their path but none went to that last stupid builder hut for another 99%.. Which is especially insulting given that I might as well have done a lazy GOWIPE for the two stars rather than coming up with a GOVALO that shredded the base (I lost maybe 2 of 10 valks).. If it's going to be this much of a reward for 100%, couldn't they at least throw you a bone and make troops intelligently clean up rather than stay in a pack? They barely would have had to go any further to path to the missing hut! Oh well.

And once again, I know this works both ways. If an opponent breaks all the way through my base, he deserves the three star even if a change meant his troops now hit the corner buildings.

---

Better AI pathing when all defensive structures are dead would make a lot of those 90%+ 2 stars into 3. "Okay...everyone spread out!!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Awness

A poll must be created to submit to SC for further analysis.

It's still stuck in my head! 99% and only one bloody star!!!

---

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...-system-debate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Awness

A poll must be created to submit to SC for further analysis.

It's still stuck in my head! 99% and only one bloody star!!!

---

We haven't talked much about high percentage current 1 star attacks. But, I do think it's fair that a high percent current 1 star is the same value as a 52% current 2 star.

Reaching a 75-80% threshold for an additional star would award that properly.