Changing lose bonus during wars

My clan is now fighting the 3rd "farming clan" in a war. That's third in a row. If you don't know the concept then here it is:
Both clans have their top 2 THs outside walls. This is agreed by the farming clan writing it in their clan bio. Every player in that clan then attacks the top two knowing that they will lose as they wont get many stars. The clan all get 30% lose bonus and its cost them next to nothing for troops.

I think this should be changed so that the lose bonus is zero (or 10%) unless the clan get 50% of the available war stars and then the lose bonus is the full 30%

To be honest it spoiling out game a little. Yes we are all making crazy bonuses as most of us are getting full loot on 1 & 2 but the reason we war is the excitement. Yes we want loot but it's more about watching the attacks and cheering on the rest of the clan.

Farming wars are boring.

I kinda like the idea of tying performance to the loot for losing the war. But, I only like it if it goes both ways. Meaning, if a clan does really well (say they got 75%+ of total stars) they should get MORE than the current loser loot. Perhaps let it vary from 10-50% loot based on how well they do? Make the current loot cover a pretty wide range though; it's fine in most cases I think.

You should take more control of your clan and tell them not to attack the top guys unless they three star a base with their first attack. This way you win the war, and members get more loot. It’s all about organization of your members. You can make the other team's plan back fire with the right amount of discipline in the clan!

You know you don't have to put your TH outside. However I was in a farming clan for a couple wars and in one of them the clan didn't put their THs outside and the leaders of my clan were ♥♥♥♥♥♥.
So keep your THs inside and ♥♥♥♥ them off if you don't like it.

That's a good idea actually.

Even make it lower, need at least 40% of war stars [which is the first xp bonus].

If you don't reach 40% stars, you get minimal loot for losing.

By doing this the game could move that loot to 'legit' losing clans and clans who draw.

Such as:
Lose under 40% - 10% loot [-20%]
Lose over 40% - 40% loot [+10%]
New draw loot - 50% loot [+10%]

I kinda like the idea, and if you'd be to ask me, I never liked the farming clans for this reason. Winning loot bonus should be a challenge, not this easy. I also agree with more loot if the clan acquires a higher amount of war stars. Support.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aarontw9

You should take more control of your clan and tell them not to attack the top guys unless they three star a base with their first attack. This way you win the war, and members get more loot. It’s all about organization of your members. You can make the other team's plan back fire with the right amount of discipline in the clan!

---

The clan we are currently in prep with we decided that we would not agree to their farming terms and that we wanted a real war. With this I went to visit them to discuss it. Their clan had 37/45 opt outs and the leader told me they were all on holiday so even if we wanted a real war all their bases would still have TH on the outside and they wouldn't attack.
As I mentioned in my original post, this is the third one of these wars in a row, my clan do attack for XP and we are the victor in the war so do get 100% but I feel that this shouldn't even be a thing.
Farming clans at my level make between 500-600k per war doing this and even if the enemy clan doesn't agree then they don't need to attack and just have to wait two days for the next war. If this option was removed all together by making a minimum star threshold for war lose bonus then it would remove all this without any negative repercussions as far as I can tell.

Sounds like a good idea, this would at least increase the incentive for a team that is losing to keep going if clan XP doesn't excite them.

But on the flipside this may lead to less participation in wars where people think they are going lose because they feel they are mismatched.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JKL2207

Sounds like a good idea, this would at least increase the incentive for a team that is losing to keep going if clan XP doesn't excite them.

But on the flipside this may lead to less participation in wars where people think they are going lose because they feel they are mismatched.

---

Even in a mismatched war if you are trying you will easily hit 40%.

For me I think it's more a case of encouraging teams in a losing war to keep trying as it will improve their reward.

And of course shut down the 'top 1 & 2 bases out' for farming purposes. Which is clearly against the intention of Clan Wars.

...which I know is strange coming from me as I was in a Farm War clan for a while, but it just felt dirty I had to get out. True wars are the ultimate clashing experience.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daz258

Even in a mismatched war if you are trying you will easily hit 40%.

For me I think it's more a case of encouraging teams in a losing war to keep trying as it will improve their reward.

And of course shut down the 'top 1 & 2 bases out' for farming purposes. Which is clearly against the intention of Clan Wars.

...which I know is strange coming from me as I was in a Farm War clan for a while, but it just felt dirty I had to get out. True wars are the ultimate clashing experience.

---

Yeah been in clan xp & loot war farm clan... gosh I felt dirty.

But with those clans at least they tried to arrange matches with similar clans but they went for TH + storages + enough buildings to for the attacker to get 50% and 2 star win without expending too many troops on every base. So that each team would get the +25 XP bonus.

I guess having something like this wouldn't really stop them.