A few ideas to consider

I love this game and it is totally addictive i have to admit. I do however have some ideas that could help make the game even better!

Firstly, i think only the leader should be allowed to promote and kick out people, change clan settings, and start wars. I know we should just "not let anyone we don't know be co leader" (yes I read that) but i barely know anyone on clash so whats the point? Part of the game is getting people to join your clan so most people in the clans don't know each other.

Secondly, I have noticed that there is a problem with your vulgarity check. I have seen several people say the f-word but sometimes it blocks things that we say that are completely harmless. It can be quite frustrating at times.

Thirdly, i am not the best at spelling and i think that spell check would help. Not really that big of a deal, but would be a nice touch.

And lastly, me and my brother came up with a great idea for clan management. This kind of ties in with the first suggestion, but is more elaborated on. We think that there should be a "leader gets final say" when any decision is made, such as starting wars, promoting, demoting, and kicking out members, changing clan settings, and other clan related decisions. We think that there should be a leader suggestion box or leader chat where members of the clan may talk to the leader about important decisions without the disruptions of the clan chat. There could be a mail type thing where they write down their idea or suggestion and send it directly to the leader's mailbox without anyone else being able to see it. The mail might include anything from a new idea for a clan flag to a complaint about a specific clan member they want kicked out. In the end the leader can make the decision of if the member gets kicked out, promoted, or demoted or if the clan settings might need some tweeking, allowing a much more controlled clan environment. We think that the leader should be the only one who can do anything involving the clan (with the exception of elders and above being able to invite people to the clan, which is already a great addition)

I hope that this wasn't too long and if it was I apologize (this was a nighttime rant/idea) and appreciate you reading this.

Keep up the good work and i hope you take this into consideration:)

#1. I think only the leader should be allowed to promote and kick out people, change clan settings, and start wars.
The whole point of a clan is to act as a team, not as a business where the owner has powers above everybody. I like the fact that clans can be managed in teams and I think it should stay like this. Also, a 45-50 members clan is very hard to be controlled by a Leader alone so he will inevitably need the help of the Co-Leaders. If you'd take all those powers from the Co-Leaders, then just delete the rank because you'd leave nothing there apart from sending clan mails.

#2. I have noticed that there is a problem with your vulgarity check.
The censor is added for every language, or the most spoken ones (not sure, didn't try to swear in every language to test it). While a word means nothing vulgar in your language, it might mean something in another, hence why all the languages share the same censor list and obey to it.

#3. I am not the best at spelling and i think that spell check would help.
Not sure what device you are using or if this option is available on any, but in my settings I have the option to include a auto correct but I ended up removing it because it corrected words wrongly. Anyway, what I'm trying to say is you might have this option already on your device, check for it or Google your device to see if it has this option.

#4. Me and my brother came up with a great idea for clan management.
Again, I am against giving too much power to a single player and I would also not like to be in his position, where I'd have to manage the clan 24/7 instead of focusing on my account and in the free time help managing the clan along with my Co-Leaders. My clan is formed of 1 Leader (obviously) and 6 Co-Leaders, from a clan of 50, and I tell you, we take all the decisions as a group (the Co+). Putting all this burden on a single person might be too much, hence why I disagree with the idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by devil9394

#1. I think only the leader should be allowed to promote and kick out people, change clan settings, and start wars.
The whole point of a clan is to act as a team, not as a business where the owner has powers above everybody. I like the fact that clans can be managed in teams and I think it should stay like this. Also, a 45-50 members clan is very hard to be controlled by a Leader alone so he will inevitably need the help of the Co-Leaders. If you'd take all those powers from the Co-Leaders, then just delete the rank because you'd leave nothing there apart from sending clan mails.

#2. I have noticed that there is a problem with your vulgarity check.
The censor is added for every language, or the most spoken ones (not sure, didn't try to swear in every language to test it). While a word means nothing vulgar in your language, it might mean something in another, hence why all the languages share the same censor list and obey to it.

#3. I am not the best at spelling and i think that spell check would help.
Not sure what device you are using or if this option is available on any, but in my settings I have the option to include a auto correct but I ended up removing it because it corrected words wrongly. Anyway, what I'm trying to say is you might have this option already on your device, check for it or Google your device to see if it has this option.

#4. Me and my brother came up with a great idea for clan management.
Again, I am against giving too much power to a single player and I would also not like to be in his position, where I'd have to manage the clan 24/7 instead of focusing on my account and in the free time help managing the clan along with my Co-Leaders. My clan is formed of 1 Leader (obviously) and 6 Co-Leaders, from a clan of 50, and I tell you, we take all the decisions as a group (the Co+). Putting all this burden on a single person might be too much, hence why I disagree with the idea.

---

Ill have to disagree with number 2. I posted a similar thread weeks ago about the censor. Its screening things that arent inappropriate in any language. This does need to be fixed. Ill bump my thread because I went into much detail about it.

I read the comments on the thread i posted and i now see many flaws in my "late night rant". I thank you for pointing them out to me as I can sometimes get over my head when it comes to controlling anything. Thanks again:)